Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)
77
MiMo-V2.5
74
Verified leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) #12 · MiMo-V2.5 unranked
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2.5 only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority.
Agentic
+2.5 difference
Coding
+17.6 difference
DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)
MiMo-V2.5
$0.14 / $0.28
$null / $null
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1M
1M
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2.5 only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority.
DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 77 versus 74. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.
DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)'s sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 73.7 against 56.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 56.9% to 65.8%. MiMo-V2.5 does hit back in agentic, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 77 to 74. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 56.9% and 65.8%.
DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 73.7 versus 56.1. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
MiMo-V2.5 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 65.8 versus 63.3. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.