Skip to main content

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking

Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

DeepSeek V4 Flash

57

VS

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking

59

0 categoriesvs2 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V4 Flash #30 · Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking unranked

Pick Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking if you want the stronger benchmark profile. DeepSeek V4 Flash only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 1M context window or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Coding

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking
57.1vs69.9

+12.8 difference

Knowledge

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking
45.2vs57.6

+12.4 difference

Operational Comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0.14 / $0.28

N/A

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

1M

128K

Quick Verdict

Pick Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking if you want the stronger benchmark profile. DeepSeek V4 Flash only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 1M context window or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 59 versus 57. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 69.9 against 57.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is LiveCodeBench, 55.2% to 69.9%.

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking is the reasoning model in the pair, while DeepSeek V4 Flash is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. DeepSeek V4 Flash gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking?

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 59 to 57. The biggest single separator in this matchup is LiveCodeBench, where the scores are 55.2% and 69.9%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking?

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 57.6 versus 45.2. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking?

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 69.9 versus 57.1. Inside this category, LiveCodeBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 8, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.