Skip to main content

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

DeepSeek V4 Flash

59

VS

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

58

0 categoriesvs3 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V4 Flash #23 · Qwen3.5-35B-A3B #18

Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
49.1vs50.6

+1.5 difference

Coding

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
57.1vs58.4

+1.3 difference

Knowledge

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
45.2vs79.3

+34.1 difference

Operational Comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0.14 / $0.28

$0 / $0

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

1M

262K

Quick Verdict

Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

DeepSeek V4 Flash finishes one point ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 59 to 58. That is enough to call, but not enough to treat as a blowout. This matchup comes down to a few meaningful edges rather than one model dominating the board.

DeepSeek V4 Flash is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.14 input / $0.28 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is the reasoning model in the pair, while DeepSeek V4 Flash is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. DeepSeek V4 Flash gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 59 to 58. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 71.2% and 84.2%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 79.3 versus 45.2. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 58.4 versus 57.1. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 50.6 versus 49.1. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 24, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.