Model comparison
DeepSeek V4 Pro Base vs Ling 3.0 Flash
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Evidence parity. DeepSeek V4 Pro Base and Ling 3.0 Flash share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 24 results are unique to DeepSeek V4 Pro Base; 0 to Ling 3.0 Flash.
Updated July 24, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- DeepSeek V4 Pro Base only
- 24
- Ling 3.0 Flash only
- 0
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for DeepSeek V4 Pro Base and Ling 3.0 Flash is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Ling 3.0 Flash yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.
DeepSeek V4 Pro Base has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for Ling 3.0 Flash.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro Base | Ling 3.0 Flash | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | DeepSeek V4 Pro BaseNot available | Ling 3.0 FlashNot available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | DeepSeek V4 Pro BaseNot available | Ling 3.0 FlashNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | DeepSeek V4 Pro BaseNot available | Ling 3.0 FlashNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | DeepSeek V4 Pro Base1M | Ling 3.0 Flash262K | DeepSeek V4 Pro Base lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Coding2 benchmarks
Reasoning6 benchmarks
Knowledge12 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro Base | Ling 3.0 Flash | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AGIEvalSource | 83.1% | — | Not comparable |
| MMLUSource | 90.1% | — | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ReduxSource | 90.8% | — | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ProSource | 73.5% | — | Not comparable |
| MMMLUSource | 90.3% | — | Not comparable |
| C-EvalSource | 93.1% | — | Not comparable |
| CMMLUSource | 90.8% | — | Not comparable |
| MultiLoKoSource | 51.1% | — | Not comparable |
| SimpleQASource | 55.2% | — | Not comparable |
| SuperGPQASource | 53.9% | — | Not comparable |
| FACTS ParametricSource | 62.6% | — | Not comparable |
| TriviaQASource | 85.6% | — | Not comparable |
Math3 benchmarks
Multilingual1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro Base | Ling 3.0 Flash | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MGSMSource | 84.4% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare DeepSeek V4 Pro Base and Ling 3.0 Flash on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for DeepSeek V4 Pro Base and Ling 3.0 Flash today?
DeepSeek V4 Pro Base: Pricing unavailable Ling 3.0 Flash: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.