Skip to main content

Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Pro Base vs Mistral Small 4

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
No comparison
46.23/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V4 Pro Base unranked (Not scored); Mistral Small 4 #140 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. DeepSeek V4 Pro Base and Mistral Small 4 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 24 results are unique to DeepSeek V4 Pro Base; 16 to Mistral Small 4.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
0
DeepSeek V4 Pro Base only
24
Mistral Small 4 only
16
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for DeepSeek V4 Pro Base and Mistral Small 4 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

DeepSeek V4 Pro Base has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Mistral Small 4.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricDeepSeek V4 Pro BaseMistral Small 4Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensDeepSeek V4 Pro BaseNot availableMistral Small 4$0.15 input / $0.6 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondDeepSeek V4 Pro BaseNot availableMistral Small 4175 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenDeepSeek V4 Pro BaseNot availableMistral Small 40.64 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensDeepSeek V4 Pro Base1MMistral Small 4256KDeepSeek V4 Pro Base lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro BaseMistral Small 4Result
AA Agentic IndexSource 4.7%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 41.2%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 4.4%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 588Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro BaseMistral Small 4Result
BigCodeBenchSource 59.2%Not comparable
HumanEvalSource 76.8%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 26.6%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 38.0%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro BaseMistral Small 4Result
BBHSource 87.5%Not comparable
DROPSource 88.7%Not comparable
HellaSwagSource 88.0%Not comparable
WinoGrandeSource 81.5%Not comparable
CLUEWSCSource 85.2%Not comparable
LongBench v2Source 51.5%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 44.7%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.3%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro BaseMistral Small 4Result
AGIEvalSource 83.1%Not comparable
MMLUSource 90.1%Not comparable
MMLU-ReduxSource 90.8%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 73.5%Not comparable
MMMLUSource 90.3%Not comparable
C-EvalSource 93.1%Not comparable
CMMLUSource 90.8%Not comparable
MultiLoKoSource 51.1%Not comparable
SimpleQASource 55.2%Not comparable
SuperGPQASource 53.9%Not comparable
FACTS ParametricSource 62.6%Not comparable
TriviaQASource 85.6%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 19.6%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 76.9%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 9.5%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -29.9%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 22.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 66.8%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro BaseMistral Small 4Result
GSM8KSource 92.6%Not comparable
MATHSource 64.5%Not comparable
CMathSource 90.9%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro BaseMistral Small 4Result
MGSMSource 84.4%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro BaseMistral Small 4Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 56.8%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro BaseMistral Small 4Result
AA-IFBenchSource 48.2%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare DeepSeek V4 Pro Base and Mistral Small 4 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for DeepSeek V4 Pro Base and Mistral Small 4 today?

DeepSeek V4 Pro Base: Pricing unavailable Mistral Small 4: $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

DeepSeek V4 Pro Base
API / mo$0
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Mistral Small 4
API / mo$563
Self-host / mo$2,278
Break-even266M/day
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.