Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)
87
MiMo-V2.5
74
Verified leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) #2 · MiMo-V2.5 unranked
Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2.5 only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Agentic
+8.2 difference
Coding
+19.8 difference
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)
MiMo-V2.5
$1.74 / $3.48
$null / $null
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1M
1M
Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2.5 only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 87 to 74. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)'s sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 75.9 against 56.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 67.9% to 65.8%.
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 87 to 74. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 67.9% and 65.8%.
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 75.9 versus 56.1. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 74 versus 65.8. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.