Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)
87
Qwen3.7 Plus
87
Verified leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) #5 · Qwen3.7 Plus #3
Treat this as a split decision. DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) makes more sense if coding is the priority; Qwen3.7 Plus is the better fit if knowledge is the priority.
Agentic
+2.3 difference
Coding
+4.8 difference
Knowledge
+1.8 difference
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)
Qwen3.7 Plus
$1.74 / $3.48
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1M
1M
Treat this as a split decision. DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) makes more sense if coding is the priority; Qwen3.7 Plus is the better fit if knowledge is the priority.
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) and Qwen3.7 Plus finish on the same provisional overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The provisional headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) and Qwen3.7 Plus are tied on the provisional overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.
Qwen3.7 Plus has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 67.9 versus 66.1. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 75.9 versus 71.1. Inside this category, LiveCodeBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 74 versus 71.7. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.