Skip to main content

Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Exaone 4.0 1.2B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
60.66/100
Margin
21.6pts
← winning
LG AI Research
39.06/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V4 Pro #46 (Supported); Exaone 4.0 1.2B #179 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. DeepSeek V4 Pro and Exaone 4.0 1.2B share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 23 results are unique to DeepSeek V4 Pro; 11 to Exaone 4.0 1.2B.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
0
DeepSeek V4 Pro only
23
Exaone 4.0 1.2B only
11
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for DeepSeek V4 Pro and Exaone 4.0 1.2B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

DeepSeek V4 Pro has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Exaone 4.0 1.2B.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricDeepSeek V4 ProExaone 4.0 1.2BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensDeepSeek V4 Pro$0.435 input / $0.87 outputExaone 4.0 1.2BNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondDeepSeek V4 ProNot availableExaone 4.0 1.2BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenDeepSeek V4 ProNot availableExaone 4.0 1.2BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensDeepSeek V4 Pro1MExaone 4.0 1.2B128KDeepSeek V4 Pro lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProExaone 4.0 1.2BResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 59.1%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource 69.4%Not comparable
ToolathlonSource 46.3%Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource 59.8%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 50.28%Not comparable
ResearchClawBenchSource 17.1%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 20.5%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProExaone 4.0 1.2BResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 73.6%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 52.1%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource 69.8%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 59.1%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 7.4%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProExaone 4.0 1.2BResult
MRCR 1MSource 44.7%Not comparable
CorpusQA 1MSource 35.6%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 0.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProExaone 4.0 1.2BResult
MMLU-ProSource 82.9%Not comparable
SimpleQASource 45%Not comparable
Chinese-SimpleQASource 75.8%Not comparable
GPQASource 72.9%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 72.9%Not comparable
HLESource 7.7%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 2.8%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 42.4%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 5.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -82.6%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 4.7%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 91.5%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProExaone 4.0 1.2BResult
HMMT Feb 2026Source 31.7%Not comparable
IMOAnswerBenchSource 35.3%Not comparable
ApexSource 0.4%Not comparable
Apex ShortlistSource 9.2%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProExaone 4.0 1.2BResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1264Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProExaone 4.0 1.2BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 25.3%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare DeepSeek V4 Pro and Exaone 4.0 1.2B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for DeepSeek V4 Pro and Exaone 4.0 1.2B today?

DeepSeek V4 Pro: $0.43 input / $0.87 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.