Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Exaone 4.0 32B
62
Gemma 4 31B
65
Pick Gemma 4 31B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Exaone 4.0 32B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.
Knowledge
+20.5 difference
Exaone 4.0 32B
Gemma 4 31B
N/A
$0 / $0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
128K
256K
Pick Gemma 4 31B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Exaone 4.0 32B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.
Gemma 4 31B has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 65 versus 62. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.
Gemma 4 31B gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for Exaone 4.0 32B.
Gemma 4 31B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 65 to 62. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMLU-Pro, where the scores are 81.8% and 85.2%.
Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.8 versus 61.3. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.