Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Exaone 4.0 32B
65
GPT-5.4 Pro
91
Pick GPT-5.4 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Exaone 4.0 32B only becomes the better choice if mathematics is the priority.
Knowledge
+32.8 difference
Math
+35.3 difference
Exaone 4.0 32B
GPT-5.4 Pro
N/A
$30 / $180
N/A
74 t/s
N/A
151.79s
128K
1.05M
Pick GPT-5.4 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Exaone 4.0 32B only becomes the better choice if mathematics is the priority.
GPT-5.4 Pro is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 91 to 65. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
GPT-5.4 Pro gives you the larger context window at 1.05M, compared with 128K for Exaone 4.0 32B.
GPT-5.4 Pro is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 91 to 65.
Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.8 versus 49. GPT-5.4 Pro stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 85.3 versus 50. GPT-5.4 Pro stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.