Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
GPT-5.4 Pro is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 87 to 83. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
GPT-5.4 Pro's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 96.3 against 81.8. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is AIME 2025, 85.3% to 99%.
GPT-5.4 Pro gives you the larger context window at 1.05M, compared with 128K for Exaone 4.0 32B.
Pick GPT-5.4 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Exaone 4.0 32B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Exaone 4.0 32B
81.8
GPT-5.4 Pro
96.3
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.
Exaone 4.0 32B
85.3
GPT-5.4 Pro
98.3
GPT-5.4 Pro is ahead overall, 87 to 83. The biggest single separator in this matchup is AIME 2025, where the scores are 85.3% and 99%.
GPT-5.4 Pro has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 96.3 versus 81.8. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5.4 Pro has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 98.3 versus 85.3. Inside this category, AIME 2025 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.