Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-5.4 Pro vs GPT-5.5 Pro

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 7 shared benchmark results across 4 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

60.89/100
Margin
2.8pts
winning →
63.69/100
1 category wins2 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-5.4 Pro #44 (Estimated); GPT-5.5 Pro #38 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-5.4 Pro and GPT-5.5 Pro share 7 comparable benchmark results. 3 of 8 categories are comparable. 5 results are unique to GPT-5.4 Pro; 0 to GPT-5.5 Pro.

Updated July 22, 2026
Shared results
7
GPT-5.4 Pro only
5
GPT-5.5 Pro only
0
Comparable categories
3 / 8

Pick GPT-5.5 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-5.4 Pro only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you need the larger 1.05M context window.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 7 shared benchmark results across 4 evidence categories; 3 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

GPT-5.5 Pro has the cleaner BenchAlign overall profile here, landing at 63.69 versus 60.89. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.

GPT-5.5 Pro's sharpest advantage is in mathematics, where it averages 48.1 against 46.9. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4), 37.500% to 39.600%. GPT-5.4 Pro does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

GPT-5.4 Pro gives you the larger context window at 1.05M, compared with 1M for GPT-5.5 Pro.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GPT-5.4 Pro and GPT-5.5 Pro
CategoryGPT-5.4 ProΔGPT-5.5 Pro
KnowledgeGPT-5.4 Pro58.7Margin 1.5GPT-5.5 Pro57.2
MathGPT-5.4 Pro46.9Margin 1.2GPT-5.5 Pro48.1
AgenticGPT-5.4 Pro89.3Margin 0.8GPT-5.5 Pro90.1
ReasoningGPT-5.4 Pro83.3MarginNo overlapGPT-5.5 ProNot measured
MultimodalGPT-5.4 Pro94.0MarginNo overlapGPT-5.5 ProNot measured

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · GPT-5.4 ProB · GPT-5.5 Pro
  1. FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)

    Math
    Source ↗
    A 37.500%B 39.600%
    Winner: GPT-5.5 ProΔ 2.1
    FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4): GPT-5.4 Pro scored 37.500%; GPT-5.5 Pro scored 39.600%. GPT-5.5 Pro wins this benchmark.
  2. HLE

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 58.7%B 57.2%
    Winner: GPT-5.4 ProΔ 1.5
    HLE: GPT-5.4 Pro scored 58.7%; GPT-5.5 Pro scored 57.2%. GPT-5.4 Pro wins this benchmark.
  3. FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)

    Math
    Source ↗
    A 50.000%B 51.000%
    Winner: GPT-5.5 ProΔ 1
    FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3): GPT-5.4 Pro scored 50.000%; GPT-5.5 Pro scored 51.000%. GPT-5.5 Pro wins this benchmark.
  4. BrowseComp

    Agentic
    Source ↗
    A 89.3%B 90.1%
    Winner: GPT-5.5 ProΔ 0.8
    BrowseComp: GPT-5.4 Pro scored 89.3%; GPT-5.5 Pro scored 90.1%. GPT-5.5 Pro wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-5.4 ProGPT-5.5 ProComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-5.4 Pro$30 input / $180 outputGPT-5.5 Pro$30 input / $180 outputListed prices are equal.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-5.4 Pro74 tok/sGPT-5.5 ProNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-5.4 Pro151.79 sGPT-5.5 ProNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-5.4 Pro1.05MGPT-5.5 Pro1MGPT-5.4 Pro lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

AgenticGPT-5.5 Pro wins
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProGPT-5.5 ProResult
BrowseCompSource 89.3%90.1%GPT-5.5 Pro leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProGPT-5.5 ProResult
ARC-AGI-2Source 83.3%Not comparable
CritPtSource 30.0%30.6%GPT-5.5 Pro leads
KnowledgeGPT-5.4 Pro wins
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProGPT-5.5 ProResult
HLESource 58.7%57.2%GPT-5.4 Pro leads
FrontierScienceSource 36.7%Not comparable
FrontierScience ResearchSource 36.7%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 42.7%43.1%GPT-5.5 Pro leads
MathGPT-5.5 Pro wins
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProGPT-5.5 ProResult
IPhO 2025 (Theory)Source 93.5%Not comparable
FrontierMath (legacy)Source 50%52.4%GPT-5.5 Pro leads
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 50.000%51.000%GPT-5.5 Pro leads
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 37.500%39.600%GPT-5.5 Pro leads
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProGPT-5.5 ProResult
MMMU-ProSource 94%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, GPT-5.4 Pro or GPT-5.5 Pro?

GPT-5.5 Pro is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 63.69 to 60.89. The biggest single separator in this matchup is FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4), where the scores are 37.500% and 39.600%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GPT-5.4 Pro or GPT-5.5 Pro?

GPT-5.4 Pro has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 58.7 versus 57.2. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, GPT-5.4 Pro or GPT-5.5 Pro?

GPT-5.5 Pro has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 48.1 versus 46.9. Inside this category, FrontierMath (legacy) is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GPT-5.4 Pro or GPT-5.5 Pro?

GPT-5.5 Pro has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 90.1 versus 89.3. Inside this category, BrowseComp is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 22, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.