Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Gemma 4 31B
74
GLM-4.7
72
Pick Gemma 4 31B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-4.7 only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Knowledge
+0.7 difference
Gemma 4 31B
GLM-4.7
$0 / $0
$0 / $0
N/A
82 t/s
N/A
1.10s
256K
200K
Pick Gemma 4 31B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-4.7 only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Gemma 4 31B has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 74 versus 72. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.
Gemma 4 31B's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 61.3 against 60.6. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HLE, 26.5% to 24.8%.
Gemma 4 31B gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 200K for GLM-4.7.
Gemma 4 31B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 74 to 72. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HLE, where the scores are 26.5% and 24.8%.
Gemma 4 31B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 61.3 versus 60.6. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.