Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
GLM-4.7
69
Qwen3.7 Max
93
Verified leaderboard positions: GLM-4.7 unranked · Qwen3.7 Max #2
Pick Qwen3.7 Max if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-4.7 only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Agentic
+24.4 difference
Coding
+3.0 difference
Knowledge
+10.6 difference
GLM-4.7
Qwen3.7 Max
$0 / $0
$null / $null
82 t/s
N/A
1.10s
N/A
200K
1M
Pick Qwen3.7 Max if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-4.7 only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Qwen3.7 Max is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 93 to 69. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Qwen3.7 Max's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 69.7 against 45.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 41% to 69.7%.
Qwen3.7 Max gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for GLM-4.7.
Qwen3.7 Max is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 93 to 69. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 41% and 69.7%.
Qwen3.7 Max has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 71.2 versus 60.6. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen3.7 Max has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 73.6 versus 70.6. Inside this category, LiveCodeBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen3.7 Max has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 69.7 versus 45.3. Inside this category, VITA-Bench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.