Skip to main content

Gemma 4 31B vs Ling 2.6 Flash

Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Gemma 4 31B

64

VS

Ling 2.6 Flash

36

2 categoriesvs0 categories

Pick Gemma 4 31B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Ling 2.6 Flash only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 262K context window or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Coding

Gemma 4 31B
41.6vs27

+14.6 difference

Knowledge

Gemma 4 31B
61.3vs59

+2.3 difference

Operational Comparison

Gemma 4 31B

Ling 2.6 Flash

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0 / $0

$null / $null

Speed

N/A

209.5 t/s

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

1.07s

Context Window

256K

262K

Quick Verdict

Pick Gemma 4 31B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Ling 2.6 Flash only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 262K context window or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Gemma 4 31B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 64 to 36. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Gemma 4 31B's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 41.6 against 27. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 84.3% to 59%.

Gemma 4 31B is the reasoning model in the pair, while Ling 2.6 Flash is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Ling 2.6 Flash gives you the larger context window at 262K, compared with 256K for Gemma 4 31B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, Gemma 4 31B or Ling 2.6 Flash?

Gemma 4 31B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 64 to 36. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 84.3% and 59%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Gemma 4 31B or Ling 2.6 Flash?

Gemma 4 31B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 61.3 versus 59. Inside this category, AA-GPQA Diamond is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Gemma 4 31B or Ling 2.6 Flash?

Gemma 4 31B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 41.6 versus 27. Inside this category, AA-SciCode is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Gemma 4 31B
API / mo$0
Self-host / mo$429
Break-even
Ling 2.6 Flash
API / mo$0
Self-host / moN/A
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 2, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.