Skip to main content

GLM-4.7 vs GPT-5.2

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GLM-4.7

71

VS

GPT-5.2

83

1 categoriesvs2 categories

Pick GPT-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-4.7 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

GPT-5.2
45.3vs55.2

+9.9 difference

Coding

GLM-4.7
70.6vs64.7

+5.9 difference

Knowledge

GPT-5.2
60.6vs92.4

+31.8 difference

Operational Comparison

GLM-4.7

GPT-5.2

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0 / $0

$2 / $8

Speed

82 t/s

73 t/s

Latency (TTFT)

1.10s

130.34s

Context Window

200K

400K

Quick Verdict

Pick GPT-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-4.7 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

GPT-5.2 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 83 to 71. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GPT-5.2's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 92.4 against 60.6. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is BrowseComp, 52% to 65.8%. GLM-4.7 does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

GPT-5.2 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $2.00 input / $8.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for GLM-4.7. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. GPT-5.2 gives you the larger context window at 400K, compared with 200K for GLM-4.7.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, GLM-4.7 or GPT-5.2?

GPT-5.2 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 83 to 71. The biggest single separator in this matchup is BrowseComp, where the scores are 52% and 65.8%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-4.7 or GPT-5.2?

GPT-5.2 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 92.4 versus 60.6. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, GLM-4.7 or GPT-5.2?

GLM-4.7 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 70.6 versus 64.7. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GLM-4.7 or GPT-5.2?

GPT-5.2 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 55.2 versus 45.3. Inside this category, BrowseComp is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 20, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.