Skip to main content

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GPT-5.2

Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

93

VS

GPT-5.2

83

2 categoriesvs0 categories

Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-5.2 only becomes the better choice if you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Reasoning

Gemini 3.1 Pro
77.1vs52.9

+24.2 difference

Multimodal

Gemini 3.1 Pro
83.9vs79.5

+4.4 difference

Operational Comparison

Gemini 3.1 Pro

GPT-5.2

Price (per 1M tokens)

$1.25 / $5

$2 / $8

Speed

109 t/s

73 t/s

Latency (TTFT)

29.71s

130.34s

Context Window

1M

400K

Quick Verdict

Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-5.2 only becomes the better choice if you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.

Gemini 3.1 Pro is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 93 to 83. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Gemini 3.1 Pro's sharpest advantage is in reasoning, where it averages 77.1 against 52.9. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is ARC-AGI-2, 77.1% to 52.9%.

GPT-5.2 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $2.00 input / $8.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $1.25 input / $5.00 output per 1M tokens for Gemini 3.1 Pro. GPT-5.2 is the reasoning model in the pair, while Gemini 3.1 Pro is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Gemini 3.1 Pro gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 400K for GPT-5.2.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Pro or GPT-5.2?

Gemini 3.1 Pro is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 93 to 83. The biggest single separator in this matchup is ARC-AGI-2, where the scores are 77.1% and 52.9%.

Which is better for reasoning, Gemini 3.1 Pro or GPT-5.2?

Gemini 3.1 Pro has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 77.1 versus 52.9. Inside this category, ARC-AGI-2 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Gemini 3.1 Pro or GPT-5.2?

Gemini 3.1 Pro has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 83.9 versus 79.5. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 20, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.