Skip to main content
benchlm.ai

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) vs Qwen3.7 Max

Head-to-head comparison across 4benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)

90

VS

Qwen3.7 Max

93

1 categoriesvs3 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) #6 · Qwen3.7 Max #2

Pick Qwen3.7 Max if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
74.9vs69.7

+5.2 difference

Coding

Qwen3.7 Max
72.9vs73.6

+0.7 difference

Reasoning

Qwen3.7 Max
75.8vs90.4

+14.6 difference

Knowledge

Qwen3.7 Max
68.2vs71.2

+3.0 difference

Operational Comparison

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)

Qwen3.7 Max

Price (per 1M tokens)

$5 / $25

$null / $null

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

1M

1M

Quick Verdict

Pick Qwen3.7 Max if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority.

Qwen3.7 Max has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 93 versus 90. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.

Qwen3.7 Max's sharpest advantage is in reasoning, where it averages 90.4 against 75.8. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HLE, 54.7% to 41.4%. Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) does hit back in agentic, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (5)

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 93 to 90. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HLE, where the scores are 54.7% and 41.4%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 71.2 versus 68.2. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 73.6 versus 72.9. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 90.4 versus 75.8. Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Qwen3.7 Max?

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 74.9 versus 69.7. Inside this category, MCP Atlas is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) vs Claude Opus 4.7Qwen3.7 Max vs GPT-5.5 ProQwen3.7 Max vs Claude Mythos PreviewQwen3.7 Max vs Gemini 3.1 ProQwen3.7 Max vs GPT-5.5Qwen3.7 Max vs GPT-5.4 ProQwen3.7 Max vs Gemini 3 Pro Deep ThinkQwen3.7 Max vs Grok 4.1

Explore More

Anthropic Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: May 20, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.