Side-by-side benchmark comparison across knowledge, coding, math, and reasoning.
Qwen2.5-72B is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 72 to 35. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Qwen2.5-72B's sharpest advantage is in mathematics, where it averages 83.1 against 23.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is AIME 2024, 86 to 23.1. GPT-4.1 mini does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
GPT-4.1 mini gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Qwen2.5-72B.
Pick Qwen2.5-72B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-4.1 mini only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.
Qwen2.5-72B
68.2
GPT-4.1 mini
75.9
Qwen2.5-72B
53.7
GPT-4.1 mini
23.6
Qwen2.5-72B
83.1
GPT-4.1 mini
23.1
Qwen2.5-72B
85
GPT-4.1 mini
88.5
Qwen2.5-72B is ahead overall, 72 to 35. The biggest single separator in this matchup is AIME 2024, where the scores are 86 and 23.1.
GPT-4.1 mini has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 75.9 versus 68.2. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen2.5-72B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 53.7 versus 23.6. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen2.5-72B has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 83.1 versus 23.1. Inside this category, AIME 2024 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-4.1 mini has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 88.5 versus 85. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.