Model comparison
GPT-4.1 mini vs Qwen2.5-72B
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: GPT-4.1 mini #160 (Estimated); Qwen2.5-72B #106 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. GPT-4.1 mini and Qwen2.5-72B share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 22 results are unique to GPT-4.1 mini; 0 to Qwen2.5-72B.
Updated July 24, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- GPT-4.1 mini only
- 22
- Qwen2.5-72B only
- 0
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for GPT-4.1 mini and Qwen2.5-72B is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Qwen2.5-72B yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.
GPT-4.1 mini is priced at $0.40 input / $1.60 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Qwen2.5-72B. GPT-4.1 mini has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Qwen2.5-72B.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | GPT-4.1 mini | Qwen2.5-72B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | GPT-4.1 mini$0.4 input / $1.6 output | Qwen2.5-72B$0 input / $0 output | Qwen2.5-72B has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | GPT-4.1 mini80 tok/s | Qwen2.5-72BNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | GPT-4.1 mini0.76 s | Qwen2.5-72BNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | GPT-4.1 mini1M | Qwen2.5-72B128K | GPT-4.1 mini lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic4 benchmarks
Coding3 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Qwen2.5-72B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLUSource | 87.5% | — | Not comparable |
| GPQASource | 64.2% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 14.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 66.4% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 4.6% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -50.1% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 17.5% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 82.0% | — | Not comparable |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Qwen2.5-72B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source | 4.483% | — | Not comparable |
Multimodal2 benchmarks
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare GPT-4.1 mini and Qwen2.5-72B on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for GPT-4.1 mini and Qwen2.5-72B today?
GPT-4.1 mini: $0.40 input / $1.60 output per 1M tokens Qwen2.5-72B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.