Side-by-side benchmark comparison across knowledge, coding, math, and reasoning.
Grok Code Fast 1 is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 58 to 43. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Grok Code Fast 1 gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for GPT-4o mini.
Pick Grok Code Fast 1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-4o mini only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
Grok Code Fast 1
53.2
GPT-4o mini
82
Grok Code Fast 1
38.3
GPT-4o mini
87.2
Grok Code Fast 1
75
GPT-4o mini
87
Grok Code Fast 1 is ahead overall, 58 to 43. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HumanEval, where the scores are 60 and 87.2.
GPT-4o mini has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 82 versus 53.2. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-4o mini has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 87.2 versus 38.3. Inside this category, HumanEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-4o mini has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 87 versus 75. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.