Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-4o mini vs Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 10 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

37.14/100
Margin
21.5pts
winning →
58.61/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-4o mini #192 (Supported); Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) #63 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-4o mini and Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) share 10 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to GPT-4o mini; 17 to Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning).

Updated July 24, 2026
Shared results
10
GPT-4o mini only
0
Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) only
17
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-4o mini and Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 10 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) is priced at $0.60 input / $3.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokens for GPT-4o mini.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GPT-4o mini and Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)
CategoryGPT-4o miniΔKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)
AgenticGPT-4o miniNot measuredMarginNo overlapKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)55.0
CodingGPT-4o miniNot measuredMarginNo overlapKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)76.8
KnowledgeGPT-4o miniNot measuredMarginNo overlapKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)87.2
MultimodalGPT-4o miniNot measuredMarginNo overlapKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)78.5

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-4o miniKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-4o mini$0.15 input / $0.6 outputKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)$0.6 input / $3 outputGPT-4o mini has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-4o mini33 tok/sKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-4o mini3.16 sKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-4o mini128KKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)128KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Result
AA Agentic IndexSource 1.0%21.7%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
GDPval-AASource 0.0%25.1%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
GDPval-AASource 2411003Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 50.8%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 60.6%Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource 11.5%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 95.9%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 32.58%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Result
AA-SciCodeSource 22.9%49.0%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
AA Coding IndexSource 11.4%46.8%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 76.8%Not comparable
Vibe Code BenchSource 17.54%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Result
AA-LCRSource 65.3%Not comparable
CritPtSource 3.1%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 6.9%35.4%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 42.6%87.9%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
AA-HLESource 4.0%29.4%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
GPQASource 87.6%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 87.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -8.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 34.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 64.6%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Result
AIME 2025Source 96.1%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 41.5%75.4%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
MMMU-ProSource 78.5%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1279Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Result
AA-IFBenchSource 31.0%70.2%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-4o mini and Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-4o mini and Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) today?

GPT-4o mini: $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokens Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning): $0.60 input / $3.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 24, 2026