Head-to-head comparison across 4benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
GPT-5.4 Pro
91
Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)
77
Pick GPT-5.4 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) only becomes the better choice if mathematics is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.
Agentic
+34.7 difference
Knowledge
+38.3 difference
Math
+46.1 difference
Multimodal
+15.5 difference
GPT-5.4 Pro
Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)
$30 / $180
$0.6 / $3
74 t/s
N/A
151.79s
N/A
1.05M
128K
Pick GPT-5.4 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) only becomes the better choice if mathematics is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.
GPT-5.4 Pro is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 91 to 77. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
GPT-5.4 Pro's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 89.3 against 54.6. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is BrowseComp, 89.3% to 60.6%. Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) does hit back in mathematics, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
GPT-5.4 Pro is also the more expensive model on tokens at $30.00 input / $180.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.60 input / $3.00 output per 1M tokens for Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning). That is roughly 60.0x on output cost alone. GPT-5.4 Pro gives you the larger context window at 1.05M, compared with 128K for Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning).
GPT-5.4 Pro is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 91 to 77. The biggest single separator in this matchup is BrowseComp, where the scores are 89.3% and 60.6%.
Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 87.3 versus 49. GPT-5.4 Pro stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 96.1 versus 50. GPT-5.4 Pro stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
GPT-5.4 Pro has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 89.3 versus 54.6. Inside this category, BrowseComp is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5.4 Pro has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 94 versus 78.5. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.