Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-4o mini vs Mercury 2

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
37.1/100
No comparison
Inception
N/A
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-4o mini #192 (Supported); Mercury 2 #129 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-4o mini and Mercury 2 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 10 results are unique to GPT-4o mini; 0 to Mercury 2.

Updated July 28, 2026
Shared results
0
GPT-4o mini only
10
Mercury 2 only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-4o mini and Mercury 2 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Mercury 2 yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.

Mercury 2 is priced at $0.25 input / $0.75 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokens for GPT-4o mini.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-4o miniMercury 2Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-4o mini$0.15 input / $0.6 outputMercury 2$0.25 input / $0.75 outputGPT-4o mini has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-4o mini33 tok/sMercury 2789 tok/sMercury 2 has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-4o mini3.16 sMercury 23.88 sGPT-4o mini reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-4o mini128KMercury 2128KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniMercury 2Result
AA Agentic IndexSource 1.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 0.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 241Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniMercury 2Result
AA-SciCodeSource 22.9%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 11.4%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniMercury 2Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 6.9%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 42.6%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 4.0%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniMercury 2Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 41.5%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniMercury 2Result
AA-IFBenchSource 31.0%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-4o mini and Mercury 2 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-4o mini and Mercury 2 today?

GPT-4o mini: $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokens Mercury 2: $0.25 input / $0.75 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 28, 2026

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.