Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-4o mini vs MiniMax M2.5

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
37.14/100
Margin
21.5pts
winning →
58.61/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-4o mini #192 (Supported); MiniMax M2.5 #62 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-4o mini and MiniMax M2.5 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 10 results are unique to GPT-4o mini; 1 to MiniMax M2.5.

Updated July 24, 2026
Shared results
0
GPT-4o mini only
10
MiniMax M2.5 only
1
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-4o mini and MiniMax M2.5 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

MiniMax M2.5 is priced at $0.30 input / $1.20 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokens for GPT-4o mini.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-4o miniMiniMax M2.5Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-4o mini$0.15 input / $0.6 outputMiniMax M2.5$0.3 input / $1.2 outputGPT-4o mini has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-4o mini33 tok/sMiniMax M2.546 tok/sMiniMax M2.5 has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-4o mini3.16 sMiniMax M2.52.12 sMiniMax M2.5 reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-4o mini128KMiniMax M2.5128KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniMiniMax M2.5Result
AA Agentic IndexSource 1.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 0.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 241Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniMiniMax M2.5Result
AA-SciCodeSource 22.9%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 11.4%Not comparable
Vibe Code BenchSource 14.85%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniMiniMax M2.5Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 6.9%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 42.6%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 4.0%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniMiniMax M2.5Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 41.5%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniMiniMax M2.5Result
AA-IFBenchSource 31.0%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-4o mini and MiniMax M2.5 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-4o mini and MiniMax M2.5 today?

GPT-4o mini: $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokens MiniMax M2.5: $0.30 input / $1.20 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 24, 2026