Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-4o mini vs o4-mini (high)

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
37.14/100
Margin
12.0pts
winning →
49.19/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-4o mini #192 (Supported); o4-mini (high) #123 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-4o mini and o4-mini (high) share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 10 results are unique to GPT-4o mini; 2 to o4-mini (high).

Updated July 24, 2026
Shared results
0
GPT-4o mini only
10
o4-mini (high) only
2
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-4o mini and o4-mini (high) is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

o4-mini (high) has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for GPT-4o mini.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-4o minio4-mini (high)Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-4o mini$0.15 input / $0.6 outputo4-mini (high)Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-4o mini33 tok/so4-mini (high)161 tok/so4-mini (high) has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-4o mini3.16 so4-mini (high)21.94 sGPT-4o mini reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-4o mini128Ko4-mini (high)200Ko4-mini (high) lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-4o minio4-mini (high)Result
AA Agentic IndexSource 1.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 0.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 241Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-4o minio4-mini (high)Result
AA-SciCodeSource 22.9%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 11.4%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-4o minio4-mini (high)Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 6.9%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 42.6%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 4.0%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGPT-4o minio4-mini (high)Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 24.828%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 6.250%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-4o minio4-mini (high)Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 41.5%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-4o minio4-mini (high)Result
AA-IFBenchSource 31.0%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-4o mini and o4-mini (high) on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-4o mini and o4-mini (high) today?

GPT-4o mini: $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokens o4-mini (high): Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 24, 2026