Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
Seed 1.6 Flash is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 56 to 52. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Seed 1.6 Flash's sharpest advantage is in reasoning, where it averages 66.8 against 49.4. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Pro, 31 to 65. GPT-4o mini does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
GPT-4o mini is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.08 input / $0.30 output per 1M tokens for Seed 1.6 Flash. That is roughly 2.0x on output cost alone. Seed 1.6 Flash is the reasoning model in the pair, while GPT-4o mini is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Seed 1.6 Flash gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for GPT-4o mini.
Pick Seed 1.6 Flash if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-4o mini only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
Seed 1.6 Flash
54.5
GPT-4o mini
50.9
Seed 1.6 Flash
27.6
GPT-4o mini
65
Seed 1.6 Flash
73.1
GPT-4o mini
60.2
Seed 1.6 Flash
66.8
GPT-4o mini
49.4
Seed 1.6 Flash
47.3
GPT-4o mini
62
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Seed 1.6 Flash
72.8
GPT-4o mini
74.7
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Seed 1.6 Flash is ahead overall, 56 to 52. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Pro, where the scores are 31 and 65.
GPT-4o mini has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 62 versus 47.3. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-4o mini has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 65 versus 27.6. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Seed 1.6 Flash has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 66.8 versus 49.4. Inside this category, MRCRv2 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Seed 1.6 Flash has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 54.5 versus 50.9. Inside this category, BrowseComp is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Seed 1.6 Flash has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 73.1 versus 60.2. Inside this category, OfficeQA Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-4o mini has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 74.7 versus 72.8. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.