Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
GPT-5.1
78
0/8 categoriesHolo3-35B-A3B
~78
1/8 categoriesGPT-5.1· Holo3-35B-A3B
Treat this as a split decision. GPT-5.1 makes more sense if you need the larger 200K context window or you want the stronger reasoning-first profile; Holo3-35B-A3B is the better fit if agentic is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.
GPT-5.1 and Holo3-35B-A3B finish on the same overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.
GPT-5.1 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.50 input / $6.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.25 input / $1.80 output per 1M tokens for Holo3-35B-A3B. That is roughly 3.3x on output cost alone. GPT-5.1 is the reasoning model in the pair, while Holo3-35B-A3B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. GPT-5.1 gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 64K for Holo3-35B-A3B.
BenchLM keeps the benchmark table and the operator tradeoffs on the same page so a better score does not hide a materially slower, pricier, or smaller-context model.
Runtime metrics show N/A when BenchLM does not have a sourced snapshot for that exact model. The scoring rules and freshness policy are documented on the methodology page.
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1 | Holo3-35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| AgenticHolo3-35B-A3B wins | ||
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 78% | — |
| BrowseComp | 79% | — |
| OSWorld-Verified | 71% | 77.8% |
| Coding | ||
| HumanEval | 89% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified | 68% | — |
| LiveCodeBench | 61% | — |
| SWE-bench Pro | 71% | — |
| Multimodal & Grounded | ||
| MMMU-Pro | 94% | — |
| OfficeQA Pro | 89% | — |
| Reasoning | ||
| MuSR | 91% | — |
| BBH | 92% | — |
| LongBench v2 | 84% | — |
| MRCRv2 | 84% | — |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 17.6% | — |
| Knowledge | ||
| MMLU | 97% | — |
| GPQA | 95% | — |
| SuperGPQA | 93% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 83% | — |
| HLE | 27% | — |
| FrontierScience | 84% | — |
| SimpleQA | 93% | — |
| Instruction Following | ||
| IFEval | 89% | — |
| Multilingual | ||
| MGSM | 89% | — |
| MMLU-ProX | 87% | — |
| Mathematics | ||
| AIME 2023 | 99% | — |
| AIME 2024 | 99% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 98% | — |
| HMMT Feb 2023 | 95% | — |
| HMMT Feb 2024 | 97% | — |
| HMMT Feb 2025 | 96% | — |
| BRUMO 2025 | 96% | — |
| MATH-500 | 94% | — |
GPT-5.1 and Holo3-35B-A3B are tied on overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.
Holo3-35B-A3B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 77.8 versus 75.8. Inside this category, OSWorld-Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.