Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Sibling matchup inside the Holo3 family.
Holo3-122B-A10B
94
Holo3-35B-A3B
100
Holo3-122B-A10B makes more sense if you want this variant’s specific profile, while Holo3-35B-A3B is the cleaner fit if agentic is the priority.
Agentic
+3.7 difference
Holo3-122B-A10B
Holo3-35B-A3B
$0.4 / $3
$null / $null
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
64K
64K
Holo3-122B-A10B makes more sense if you want this variant’s specific profile, while Holo3-35B-A3B is the cleaner fit if agentic is the priority.
Holo3-122B-A10B and Holo3-35B-A3B sit in the same Holo3 family. This page is less about two unrelated model lineages and more about how the siblings trade off on benchmark shape, token costs, and practical limits like context window.
Holo3-35B-A3B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 100 to 94. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Holo3-35B-A3B's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 82.6 against 78.9. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is OSWorld-Verified, 78.8% to 82.6%.
Holo3-122B-A10B and Holo3-35B-A3B are sibling variants in the Holo3 family, so the right pick depends on whether you value the better benchmark line, cheaper tokens, or the larger context window. Holo3-35B-A3B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard 100 to 94.
Holo3-35B-A3B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 82.6 versus 78.9. Inside this category, OSWorld-Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.