Skip to main content

GPT-5.2 vs Qwen3.6-27B

Head-to-head comparison across 4benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GPT-5.2

83

VS

Qwen3.6-27B

72

2 categoriesvs2 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: GPT-5.2 unranked · Qwen3.6-27B #10

Pick GPT-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.6-27B only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Qwen3.6-27B
55.2vs59.3

+4.1 difference

Coding

Qwen3.6-27B
64.7vs70.6

+5.9 difference

Knowledge

GPT-5.2
92.4vs62.2

+30.2 difference

Multimodal

GPT-5.2
79.5vs75.8

+3.7 difference

Operational Comparison

GPT-5.2

Qwen3.6-27B

Price (per 1M tokens)

$2 / $8

$0 / $0

Speed

73 t/s

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

130.34s

N/A

Context Window

400K

262K

Quick Verdict

Pick GPT-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.6-27B only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

GPT-5.2 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 83 to 72. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GPT-5.2's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 92.4 against 62.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 92.4% to 87.8%. Qwen3.6-27B does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

GPT-5.2 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $2.00 input / $8.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Qwen3.6-27B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. GPT-5.2 gives you the larger context window at 400K, compared with 262K for Qwen3.6-27B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (5)

Which is better, GPT-5.2 or Qwen3.6-27B?

GPT-5.2 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 83 to 72. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 92.4% and 87.8%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GPT-5.2 or Qwen3.6-27B?

GPT-5.2 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 92.4 versus 62.2. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, GPT-5.2 or Qwen3.6-27B?

Qwen3.6-27B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 70.6 versus 64.7. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GPT-5.2 or Qwen3.6-27B?

Qwen3.6-27B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 59.3 versus 55.2. GPT-5.2 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, GPT-5.2 or Qwen3.6-27B?

GPT-5.2 has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 79.5 versus 75.8. Inside this category, V* is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

GPT-5.2
API / mo$7,500
Self-host / moN/A
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Qwen3.6-27B
API / mo$0
Self-host / mo$429
Break-even
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 22, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.