Skip to main content

GPT-5.2 vs Qwen3.6-27B

Head-to-head comparison across 4benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GPT-5.2

79

VS

Qwen3.6-27B

73

2 categoriesvs2 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: GPT-5.2 unranked · Qwen3.6-27B #18

Pick GPT-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.6-27B only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Qwen3.6-27B
55.2vs59.3

+4.1 difference

Coding

Qwen3.6-27B
64.7vs70.6

+5.9 difference

Knowledge

GPT-5.2
92.4vs62.2

+30.2 difference

Multimodal

GPT-5.2
80.3vs76.6

+3.7 difference

Operational Comparison

GPT-5.2

Qwen3.6-27B

Price (per 1M tokens)

$1.75 / $14

$0 / $0

Speed

73 t/s

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

130.34s

N/A

Context Window

400K

262K

Quick Verdict

Pick GPT-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.6-27B only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

GPT-5.2 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 79 to 73. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GPT-5.2's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 92.4 against 62.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 92.4% to 87.8%. Qwen3.6-27B does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

GPT-5.2 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.75 input / $14.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Qwen3.6-27B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. GPT-5.2 gives you the larger context window at 400K, compared with 262K for Qwen3.6-27B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (5)

Which is better, GPT-5.2 or Qwen3.6-27B?

GPT-5.2 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 79 to 73. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 92.4% and 87.8%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GPT-5.2 or Qwen3.6-27B?

GPT-5.2 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 92.4 versus 62.2. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, GPT-5.2 or Qwen3.6-27B?

Qwen3.6-27B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 70.6 versus 64.7. Inside this category, AA-SciCode is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GPT-5.2 or Qwen3.6-27B?

Qwen3.6-27B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 59.3 versus 55.2. Inside this category, GDPval-AA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, GPT-5.2 or Qwen3.6-27B?

GPT-5.2 has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 80.3 versus 76.6. Inside this category, V* is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

GPT-5.2
API / mo$11,813
Self-host / moN/A
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Qwen3.6-27B
API / mo$0
Self-host / mo$429
Break-even
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 2, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.