Skip to main content

GPT-5.4 mini vs Qwen3.6-27B

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GPT-5.4 mini

69

VS

Qwen3.6-27B

73

1 categoriesvs1 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: GPT-5.4 mini unranked · Qwen3.6-27B #18

Pick Qwen3.6-27B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-5.4 mini only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 400K context window.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

GPT-5.4 mini
65.6vs59.3

+6.3 difference

Knowledge

Qwen3.6-27B
57.4vs62.2

+4.8 difference

Multimodal

Tie
76.6vs76.6

Operational Comparison

GPT-5.4 mini

Qwen3.6-27B

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0.75 / $4.5

$0 / $0

Speed

201 t/s

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

3.85s

N/A

Context Window

400K

262K

Quick Verdict

Pick Qwen3.6-27B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-5.4 mini only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 400K context window.

Qwen3.6-27B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 73 to 69. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Qwen3.6-27B's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 62.2 against 57.4. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HLE, 41.5% to 24%. GPT-5.4 mini does hit back in agentic, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

GPT-5.4 mini is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.75 input / $4.50 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Qwen3.6-27B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. GPT-5.4 mini gives you the larger context window at 400K, compared with 262K for Qwen3.6-27B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, GPT-5.4 mini or Qwen3.6-27B?

Qwen3.6-27B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 73 to 69. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HLE, where the scores are 41.5% and 24%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GPT-5.4 mini or Qwen3.6-27B?

Qwen3.6-27B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 62.2 versus 57.4. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GPT-5.4 mini or Qwen3.6-27B?

GPT-5.4 mini has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 65.6 versus 59.3. Inside this category, GDPval-AA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, GPT-5.4 mini or Qwen3.6-27B?

GPT-5.4 mini and Qwen3.6-27B are effectively tied for multimodal and grounded tasks here, both landing at 76.6 on average.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

GPT-5.4 mini
API / mo$3,938
Self-host / moN/A
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Qwen3.6-27B
API / mo$0
Self-host / mo$429
Break-even
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 2, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.