Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Sibling matchup inside the GPT-5.4 family.
GPT-5.4
89
GPT-5.4 mini
71
Verified leaderboard positions: GPT-5.4 #12 · GPT-5.4 mini unranked
GPT-5.4 makes more sense if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 1.05M context window, while GPT-5.4 mini is the cleaner fit if multimodal & grounded is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.
Agentic
+11.4 difference
Knowledge
+8.7 difference
Multimodal
+3.9 difference
GPT-5.4
GPT-5.4 mini
$2.5 / $15
$0.75 / $4.5
74 t/s
201 t/s
151.79s
3.85s
1.05M
400K
GPT-5.4 makes more sense if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 1.05M context window, while GPT-5.4 mini is the cleaner fit if multimodal & grounded is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.
GPT-5.4 and GPT-5.4 mini sit in the same GPT-5.4 family. This page is less about two unrelated model lineages and more about how the siblings trade off on benchmark shape, token costs, and practical limits like context window.
GPT-5.4 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 89 to 71. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
GPT-5.4's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 77 against 65.6. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 75.1% to 60%. GPT-5.4 mini does hit back in multimodal & grounded, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
GPT-5.4 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $2.50 input / $15.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.75 input / $4.50 output per 1M tokens for GPT-5.4 mini. That is roughly 3.3x on output cost alone. GPT-5.4 gives you the larger context window at 1.05M, compared with 400K for GPT-5.4 mini.
GPT-5.4 and GPT-5.4 mini are sibling variants in the GPT-5.4 family, so the right pick depends on whether you value the better benchmark line, cheaper tokens, or the larger context window. GPT-5.4 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard 89 to 71.
GPT-5.4 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 66.1 versus 57.4. Inside this category, HLE w/o tools is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5.4 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 77 versus 65.6. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5.4 mini has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 76.6 versus 72.7. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.