GPT-5.4 Pro vs Granite-4.0-H-1B

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

Agentic
Coding
Multimodal & Grounded
Reasoning
Knowledge
Instruction Following
Multilingual
Mathematics

GPT-5.4 Pro· Granite-4.0-H-1B

Quick Verdict

Pick GPT-5.4 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Granite-4.0-H-1B only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

GPT-5.4 Pro is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 92 to 43. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GPT-5.4 Pro's sharpest advantage is in multilingual, where it averages 95.7 against 37.8. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 99% to 29.9%.

GPT-5.4 Pro is also the more expensive model on tokens at $30.00 input / $180.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Granite-4.0-H-1B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. GPT-5.4 Pro is the reasoning model in the pair, while Granite-4.0-H-1B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. GPT-5.4 Pro gives you the larger context window at 1.05M, compared with 128K for Granite-4.0-H-1B.

Operational tradeoffs

ProviderOpenAIIBM
Price$30.00 / $180.00Free*
Speed74 t/sN/A
TTFT151.79sN/A
Context1.05M128K

Decision framing

BenchLM keeps the benchmark table and the operator tradeoffs on the same page so a better score does not hide a materially slower, pricier, or smaller-context model.

Runtime metrics show N/A when BenchLM does not have a sourced snapshot for that exact model. The scoring rules and freshness policy are documented on the methodology page.

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProGranite-4.0-H-1B
Agentic
Terminal-Bench 2.090%
BrowseComp89.3%
OSWorld-Verified84%
Coding
HumanEval95%74%
SWE-bench Verified86%
LiveCodeBench86%
SWE-bench Pro89%
Multimodal & Grounded
MMMU-Pro94%
Reasoning
MuSR95%
BBH98%60.4%
LongBench v295%
MRCRv297%
KnowledgeGPT-5.4 Pro wins
MMLU99%59.4%
GPQA99%29.9%
SuperGPQA97%
MMLU-Pro94%34.0%
HLE50%
FrontierScience92%
SimpleQA97%
Instruction FollowingGPT-5.4 Pro wins
IFEval97%77.4%
MultilingualGPT-5.4 Pro wins
MGSM97%37.8%
MMLU-ProX95%
Mathematics
AIME 202399%
AIME 202499%
AIME 202599%
HMMT Feb 202396%
HMMT Feb 202498%
HMMT Feb 202597%
BRUMO 202597%
MATH-50099%
Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, GPT-5.4 Pro or Granite-4.0-H-1B?

GPT-5.4 Pro is ahead overall, 92 to 43. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 99% and 29.9%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GPT-5.4 Pro or Granite-4.0-H-1B?

GPT-5.4 Pro has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 84.9 versus 32.6. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, GPT-5.4 Pro or Granite-4.0-H-1B?

GPT-5.4 Pro has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 97 versus 77.4. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multilingual tasks, GPT-5.4 Pro or Granite-4.0-H-1B?

GPT-5.4 Pro has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 95.7 versus 37.8. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 31, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.