Claude Mythos Preview vs GPT-5.4

Head-to-head comparison across 3 benchmark categories

Claude Mythos Preview

84

VS

GPT-5.4

82

3 categoriesvs0 categories

Pick Claude Mythos Preview if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-5.4 only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill or you need the larger 1.05M context window.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Claude Mythos Preview
80.9vs77

+3.9 difference

Coding

Claude Mythos Preview
83.8vs57.7

+26.1 difference

Multimodal

Claude Mythos Preview
92.7vs81.2

+11.5 difference

Operational Comparison

Claude Mythos Preview

GPT-5.4

Price (per 1M tokens)

$25 / $125

$2.5 / $15

Speed

N/A

74 t/s

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

151.79s

Context Window

1M

1.05M

Quick Verdict

Pick Claude Mythos Preview if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-5.4 only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill or you need the larger 1.05M context window.

Claude Mythos Preview has the cleaner overall profile here, landing at 84 versus 82. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.

Claude Mythos Preview's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 83.8 against 57.7. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Pro, 77.8% to 57.7%.

Claude Mythos Preview is also the more expensive model on tokens at $25.00 input / $125.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $2.50 input / $15.00 output per 1M tokens for GPT-5.4. That is roughly 8.3x on output cost alone. GPT-5.4 gives you the larger context window at 1.05M, compared with 1M for Claude Mythos Preview.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Claude Mythos Preview or GPT-5.4?

Claude Mythos Preview is ahead overall, 84 to 82. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Pro, where the scores are 77.8% and 57.7%.

Which is better for coding, Claude Mythos Preview or GPT-5.4?

Claude Mythos Preview has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 83.8 versus 57.7. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Claude Mythos Preview or GPT-5.4?

Claude Mythos Preview has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 80.9 versus 77. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Claude Mythos Preview or GPT-5.4?

Claude Mythos Preview has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 92.7 versus 81.2. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 7, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.