Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
Granite-4.0-H-1B
~43
0/8 categoriesMiMo-V2-Pro
~85
Winner · 1/8 categoriesGranite-4.0-H-1B· MiMo-V2-Pro
Pick MiMo-V2-Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Granite-4.0-H-1B only becomes the better choice if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
MiMo-V2-Pro is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 85 to 43. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
MiMo-V2-Pro's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 87 against 32.6. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 29.9% to 87%.
MiMo-V2-Pro is the reasoning model in the pair, while Granite-4.0-H-1B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. MiMo-V2-Pro gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Granite-4.0-H-1B.
BenchLM keeps the benchmark table and the operator tradeoffs on the same page so a better score does not hide a materially slower, pricier, or smaller-context model.
Runtime metrics show N/A when BenchLM does not have a sourced snapshot for that exact model. The scoring rules and freshness policy are documented on the methodology page.
| Benchmark | Granite-4.0-H-1B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Agentic | ||
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | — | 86.7% |
| Coding | ||
| HumanEval | 74% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 78% |
| Multimodal & Grounded | ||
| Coming soon | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| BBH | 60.4% | — |
| KnowledgeMiMo-V2-Pro wins | ||
| MMLU | 59.4% | — |
| GPQA | 29.9% | 87% |
| MMLU-Pro | 34.0% | — |
| Instruction Following | ||
| IFEval | 77.4% | — |
| Multilingual | ||
| MGSM | 37.8% | — |
| Mathematics | ||
| Coming soon | ||
MiMo-V2-Pro is ahead overall, 85 to 43. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 29.9% and 87%.
MiMo-V2-Pro has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 87 versus 32.6. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.