Model comparison
Kimi 3 vs MiniMax M2.7
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Evidence parity. Kimi 3 and MiniMax M2.7 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Kimi 3; 37 to MiniMax M2.7.
Updated July 14, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Kimi 3 only
- 0
- MiniMax M2.7 only
- 37
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Kimi 3 and MiniMax M2.7 is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Kimi 3 yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.
MiniMax M2.7 has the larger context window at 200K, compared with null for Kimi 3.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Kimi 3 | MiniMax M2.7 | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Kimi 3Not available | MiniMax M2.7$0.3 input / $1.2 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Kimi 3Not available | MiniMax M2.745 tok/s | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Kimi 3Not available | MiniMax M2.72.53 s | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Kimi 3Not available | MiniMax M2.7200K | A complete context comparison is not available. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic11 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Kimi 3 | MiniMax M2.7 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 57% | Not comparable |
| Tau2-TelecomSource | — | 84.8% | Not comparable |
| ToolathlonSource | — | 46.3% | Not comparable |
| MLE-Bench LiteSource | — | 66.6% | Not comparable |
| MM-ClawBenchSource | — | 62.7% | Not comparable |
| Claw-EvalSource | — | 48.7% | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | — | 25.6% | Not comparable |
| APEX-Agents-AASource | — | 10.6% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 32.9% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 1158 | Not comparable |
| Gert LabsSource | — | 40.40% | Not comparable |
Coding12 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Kimi 3 | MiniMax M2.7 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified*Source | — | 75.4% | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench ProSource | — | 56.2% | Not comparable |
| SWE-RebenchSource | — | 51.9% | Not comparable |
| SWE MultilingualSource | — | 76.5% | Not comparable |
| Multi-SWE BenchSource | — | 52.7% | Not comparable |
| VIBE-ProSource | — | 55.6% | Not comparable |
| NL2RepoSource | — | 39.8% | Not comparable |
| Vibe Code BenchSource | — | 27.04% | Not comparable |
| React Native EvalsSource | — | 71.4% | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | — | 52.6% | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench HardSource | — | 39.4% | Not comparable |
| AA-SciCodeSource | — | 47.0% | Not comparable |
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Kimi 3 | MiniMax M2.7 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA-DSource | — | 87.0% | Not comparable |
| MMLU-Pro (Arcee)Source | — | 80.8% | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | — | 38.1% | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | — | 87.4% | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | — | 28.1% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | 0.7% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 26.1% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 34.4% | Not comparable |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Kimi 3 | MiniMax M2.7 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME25 (Arcee)Source | — | 80.0% | Not comparable |
Multimodal2 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Kimi 3 | MiniMax M2.7 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | — | 75.7% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Kimi 3 and MiniMax M2.7 on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Kimi 3 and MiniMax M2.7 today?
Kimi 3: Pricing unavailable MiniMax M2.7: $0.30 input / $1.20 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.