Skip to main content

Model comparison

Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8 Max Preview

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
Moonshot AI
80.96/100
No comparison
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Kimi K3 #4 (Supported); Qwen3.8 Max Preview unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Kimi K3 and Qwen3.8 Max Preview share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 54 results are unique to Kimi K3; 0 to Qwen3.8 Max Preview.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
0
Kimi K3 only
54
Qwen3.8 Max Preview only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Kimi K3 and Qwen3.8 Max Preview is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Qwen3.8 Max Preview yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricKimi K3Qwen3.8 Max PreviewComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensKimi K3$3 input / $15 outputQwen3.8 Max PreviewNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondKimi K3Not availableQwen3.8 Max PreviewNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenKimi K3Not availableQwen3.8 Max PreviewNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensKimi K31.05MQwen3.8 Max PreviewNot availableA complete context comparison is not available.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkKimi K3Qwen3.8 Max PreviewResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 88.3%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 91.2%Not comparable
DeepSearchQASource 95.0%Not comparable
Toolathlon-VerifiedSource 73.2%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource 84.2%Not comparable
AutomationBenchSource 30.8%Not comparable
JobBenchSource 52.9%Not comparable
APEX-AgentsSource 37.6%Not comparable
SpreadsheetBench 2Source 34.8%Not comparable
DECK-BenchSource 73.5%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 50.1%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 59.2%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1685Not comparable
AA BriefcaseSource 1548Not comparable
AA AutomationBenchSource 52.7%Not comparable
AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource 45.3%Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource 26.7%Not comparable
AA Tau3 BankingSource 33.4%Not comparable
aaTerminalBench21Source 85%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkKimi K3Qwen3.8 Max PreviewResult
deepSweSource 67.5%Not comparable
FrontierSWESource 81.2%Not comparable
ProgramBenchSource 77.8%Not comparable
Kimi Code Bench v2Source 72.9%Not comparable
sweMarathonSource 42%Not comparable
PostTrain BenchSource 36.6%Not comparable
MLS-Bench LiteSource 48.3%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 76.2%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 58.7%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkKimi K3Qwen3.8 Max PreviewResult
AA-LCRSource 74.7%Not comparable
CritPtSource 23.4%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkKimi K3Qwen3.8 Max PreviewResult
GPQASource 93.5%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 93.5%Not comparable
HLESource 56%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 43.5%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 57.1%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 93.5%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 44.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 18.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 46.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 50.9%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkKimi K3Qwen3.8 Max PreviewResult
OfficeQA ProSource 63.3%Not comparable
MMMU-ProSource 81.6%Not comparable
MMMU-Pro w/ PythonSource 83.4%Not comparable
CharXiv w/o toolsSource 84.8%Not comparable
CharXivSource 91.3%Not comparable
MathVisionSource 94.3%Not comparable
MathVision w/ PythonSource 97.8%Not comparable
BabyVision w/ PythonSource 85.7%Not comparable
ZeroBenchSource 23.0%Not comparable
ZeroBench w/ PythonSource 41.0%Not comparable
WorldVQA ForceAnswerSource 51.0%Not comparable
OmniDocBenchSource 91.1%Not comparable
PerceptionBenchSource 58.5%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 80.5%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Kimi K3 and Qwen3.8 Max Preview on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Kimi K3 and Qwen3.8 Max Preview today?

Kimi K3: $3.00 input / $15.00 output per 1M tokens Qwen3.8 Max Preview: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.