Skip to main content

Model comparison

Kimi 3 vs Sakana Fugu

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Benchmark data for one or both models is coming soon. This page currently shows metadata and pricing where BenchLM has it, and score-level comparisons will populate as public benchmark results land.
Moonshot AI
N/A
No comparison
Sakana AI
75/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Evidence parity. Kimi 3 and Sakana Fugu share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Kimi 3; 11 to Sakana Fugu.

Updated July 14, 2026
Shared results
0
Kimi 3 only
0
Sakana Fugu only
11
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Kimi 3 and Sakana Fugu is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Kimi 3 yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.

Sakana Fugu has the larger context window at 1M, compared with null for Kimi 3.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricKimi 3Sakana FuguComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensKimi 3Not availableSakana FuguNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondKimi 3Not availableSakana FuguNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenKimi 3Not availableSakana FuguNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensKimi 3Not availableSakana Fugu1MA complete context comparison is not available.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkKimi 3Sakana FuguResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 80.2%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkKimi 3Sakana FuguResult
SWE-bench ProSource 59%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 80.2%Not comparable
LiveCodeBench v6Source 92.9%Not comparable
LiveCodeBench ProSource 87.8%Not comparable
SciCodeSource 60.1%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkKimi 3Sakana FuguResult
MRCRv2Source 86.6%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkKimi 3Sakana FuguResult
GPQASource 95.5%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 95.5%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 47.2%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkKimi 3Sakana FuguResult
CharXivSource 85.1%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Kimi 3 and Sakana Fugu on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Kimi 3 and Sakana Fugu today?

Kimi 3: Pricing unavailable Sakana Fugu: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 14, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.