Skip to main content

Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)

79

VS

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)

72

2 categoriesvs1 categories

Pick Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 256K context window.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)
54.6vs65.4

+10.8 difference

Coding

Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)
76.8vs54.1

+22.7 difference

Knowledge

Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)
87.3vs73.9

+13.4 difference

Operational Comparison

Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)

Price (per 1M tokens)

$null / $null

N/A

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

128K

256K

Quick Verdict

Pick Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 256K context window.

Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 79 to 72. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)'s sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 76.8 against 54.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 50.8% to 65.4%. Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) does hit back in agentic, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning).

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) or Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)?

Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 79 to 72. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 50.8% and 65.4%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) or Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)?

Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 87.3 versus 73.9. Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for coding, Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) or Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)?

Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 76.8 versus 54.1. Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) or Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)?

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 65.4 versus 54.6. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 20, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.