Skip to main content

MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

82

VS

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)

72

2 categoriesvs1 categories

Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Category Breakdown

Agentic

MiMo-V2.5-Pro
68.4vs65.4

+3.0 difference

Coding

MiMo-V2.5-Pro
57.2vs54.1

+3.1 difference

Knowledge

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)
48vs73.9

+25.9 difference

Operational Comparison

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)

Price (per 1M tokens)

$1 / $3

N/A

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

1M

256K

Quick Verdict

Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 82 to 72. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 57.2 against 54.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 68.4% to 65.4%. Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Qwen 3.6 Max (preview).

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 82 to 72. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 68.4% and 65.4%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)?

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 73.9 versus 48. MiMo-V2.5-Pro stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for coding, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 57.2 versus 54.1. Inside this category, terminalBench2 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 68.4 versus 65.4. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 22, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.