Skip to main content

GLM-5.1

Z.AISupersededReleased Apr 7, 2026
Overall Score
74Prov. #34 of 124Verified #30 of 33
Arena Elo
1475
Categories Ranked
5of 8
Price (1M tokens)
$1.4 in / $4.4 out
Speed
N/A
Context
203K
Open WeightSelf-hostReasoning
Confidence
snapshot

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

GLM-5.1
API / mo$4,350
Self-host / mo$18,221
Break-even264M/day
Model the full break-even

According to BenchLM.ai, GLM-5.1 ranks #34 out of 124 models on the provisional leaderboard with an overall score of 74/100. It also ranks #30 out of 33 on the verified leaderboard. While not a frontier model, it offers specific advantages depending on the use case.

GLM-5.1 is a open weight model with a 203K token context window. It uses explicit chain-of-thought reasoning, which typically improves performance on math and complex reasoning tasks at the cost of higher latency and token usage.

GLM-5.1 sits inside the GLM-5 family alongside GLM-5, GLM-5.2, GLM-5 (Reasoning), GLM-5V-Turbo, GLM-5-Turbo. BenchLM links it directly to GLM-5 as the earlier related model in that lineage. This profile currently has 34 of 249 tracked benchmarks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated benchmark rows publicly, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.

Its strongest category is Instruction Following (#9), while its weakest is Reasoning (#32). This performance profile makes it a well-rounded choice across a range of tasks.

Ranking Distribution

Category rank across 6 benchmark categories — sorted by best rank

Category Performance

Scores across all benchmark categories (0-100 scale)

Category Breakdown

Agentic

66.3/ 100
Weight: 22%11 benchmarks
Terminal-Bench 2.0BrowseCompOSWorld-VerifiedGAIATAU-benchWebArena

Coding

#20
81.3/ 100
Weight: 20%7 benchmarks
SWE-bench VerifiedLiveCodeBenchSWE-bench ProSWE-RebenchSciCode

Reasoning

#32
60.5/ 100
Weight: 17%2 benchmarks
MuSRLongBench v2MRCRv2ARC-AGI-2

Knowledge

#12
83.0/ 100
Weight: 12%8 benchmarks
GPQASuperGPQAMMLU-ProHLEFrontierScienceSimpleQA

Math

#13
91.3/ 100
Weight: 5%4 benchmarks
AIME 2025BRUMO 2025MATH-500FrontierMath

Multilingual

0.0/ 100
Weight: 7%0 benchmarks
MGSMMMLU-ProX

Multimodal

0.0/ 100
Weight: 12%1 benchmark
MMMU-ProOfficeQA ProCharXivCharXiv w/o tools

Inst. Following

#9
93.8/ 100
Weight: 5%1 benchmark
IFEvalIFBench

Chatbot Arena Performance

Text Overall1475CI: ±5.716,101 votes
Coding1529CI: ±9.74,538 votes
Math1474CI: ±19.4966 votes
Instruction Following1469CI: ±8.75,420 votes
Creative Writing1462CI: ±12.72,561 votes
Multi-turn1486CI: ±12.12,722 votes
Hard Prompts1499CI: ±6.810,530 votes
Hard Prompts (English)1505CI: ±9.05,337 votes
Longer Query1491CI: ±8.36,830 votes

Benchmark Details

Only benchmark rows with an attached exact-source record are shown here. Source-unverified manual rows and generated rows are hidden from model pages.

GLM-5 Family

snapshot · 5.1

Canonical Entry

GLM-5

Related Earlier Model

GLM-5

Frequently Asked Questions

How does GLM-5.1 perform overall in AI benchmarks?

GLM-5.1 currently ranks #34 out of 124 models on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard with an overall score of 74. It also ranks #30 out of 33 on the verified leaderboard. It is created by Z.AI and features a 203K context window.

Is GLM-5.1 good for knowledge and understanding?

GLM-5.1 ranks #12 out of 124 models in knowledge and understanding benchmarks with an average score of 83. There are stronger options in this category.

Is GLM-5.1 good for coding and programming?

GLM-5.1 ranks #20 out of 124 models in coding and programming benchmarks with an average score of 81.3. There are stronger options in this category.

Is GLM-5.1 good for mathematics?

GLM-5.1 ranks #13 out of 124 models in mathematics benchmarks with an average score of 91.3. There are stronger options in this category.

Is GLM-5.1 good for reasoning and logic?

GLM-5.1 ranks #32 out of 124 models in reasoning and logic benchmarks with an average score of 60.5. There are stronger options in this category.

Is GLM-5.1 good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?

GLM-5.1 has visible benchmark coverage in agentic tool use and computer tasks, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Is GLM-5.1 good for multimodal and grounded tasks?

GLM-5.1 has visible benchmark coverage in multimodal and grounded tasks, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Is GLM-5.1 good for instruction following?

GLM-5.1 ranks #9 out of 124 models in instruction following benchmarks with an average score of 93.8. It is among the top performers in this category.

Is GLM-5.1 open source?

Yes, GLM-5.1 is an open weight model created by Z.AI, meaning it can be downloaded and run locally or fine-tuned for specific use cases.

Which sibling models are related to GLM-5.1?

GLM-5.1 belongs to the GLM-5 family. Related variants on BenchLM include GLM-5, GLM-5.2, GLM-5 (Reasoning), GLM-5V-Turbo, GLM-5-Turbo.

Does GLM-5.1 have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?

Not yet. GLM-5.1 currently has 34 published benchmark scores out of the 249 benchmarks BenchLM tracks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated public benchmark rows, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.

What is the context window size of GLM-5.1?

GLM-5.1 has a context window of 203K, which determines how much text it can process in a single interaction.

Last updated: June 18, 2026 · Runtime metrics stay blank until BenchLM has a sourced snapshot.

Don't miss the next GPT moment

Which models moved up, what’s new, and what it costs. One email a week, 3-min read.

Free. One email per week.