Capability
62.3/100
field median 58.2
#47 of 218 ranked models
Five or fewer confirmed AI changes, with original sources, on mornings when something changed.A free source-linked morning brief.
Start free briefReleased Mar 1, 2026 — see all recent releases
Data as of August 14, 2026 · How the score is built
Published rows are visible, but no category has enough eligible evidence for a comparative rank.
2 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. Independent runtime speed has not been measured.
Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.
Capability
62.3/100
field median 58.2
#47 of 218 ranked models
Price
$1.20input / $4 output
input median $1
blended $2.60
Speed
Not measured
field median 94 tok/s
Time to first token not measured
Context
200Ktokens
field median 200,000
Reported for this model; direct source link not stored
Published API price against the public score. The x-axis uses a log scale; the dashed path marks models that are not beaten by a cheaper, higher-scoring option. Price uses average of published input and output rates.
The chart opens on the current model. Scroll horizontally to inspect the full price axis.
Horizontal: blended price per million tokens, log scale · Vertical: public score
Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.
Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.
Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.
| Category | Score | Rank | Percentile | Weight | Benchmarks | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgenticRank Not rankedWeight 22%2 benchmarksVerified | 57.6 | Not ranked | Not available | 22% | 2 benchmarks | Verified |
| CodingWeight 20%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 20% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 17% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| KnowledgeWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 7% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultimodalWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| Inst. FollowingWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
Agentic opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claw-Eval | Score53.8% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Ornith-1.0-397B · 77.1% | Gap23.3 behind | WeightDisplay only | Benchmark exact |
| Gert LabsGert Labs Composite Game Benchmark | Score30.76% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 4.8 · 72.97% | Gap42.2 behind | WeightDisplay only | Benchmark exact |
The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.
Mar 1, 2026 · you are here
GLM-5V-TurboScore 62.3 · $1.2 / $4
Vision-turbo
The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.
GLM-5V-Turbo ranks #47 of 218 on the public leaderboard with a score of 62.28/100. Its source-verified position is #37 of 104.
GLM-5V-Turbo is a proprietary model with a 200K context window. No explicit reasoning mode is documented in this profile.
Official exact-value snapshot from Z.AI's GLM-5V-Turbo benchmark summary. BenchLM maps the published BrowseComp-VL score to BrowseComp and the published OSWorld score to OSWorld-Verified as display-compatible proxies. It also stores the published multimodal coding, multimodal tool-use, AndroidWorld, and WebVoyager results as display-only references outside ranking math.
GLM-5V-Turbo sits in the GLM-5 family with GLM-5, GLM-5.2, GLM-5.1, GLM-5 (Reasoning), GLM-5-Turbo, GLM-5.3. 2 of 437 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.
GLM-5V-Turbo ranks #47 out of 218 models on the public BenchAlign leaderboard, with a score of 62.28/100. Its evidence status is Supported, and this profile shows 2 source-displayable benchmark rows. The label describes evidence depth, not a provider quality claim; inspect category rows before choosing a workload.
GLM-5V-Turbo has source-displayable benchmark coverage for agentic tool use and computer tasks, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
GLM-5V-Turbo belongs to the GLM-5 family. Related tracked variants include GLM-5, GLM-5.2, GLM-5.1, plus 3 more. A sibling link indicates shared lineage or a documented configuration relationship; it does not mean the variants have identical pricing, context limits, benchmark evidence, or deployment behavior. Compare before switching.
No. GLM-5V-Turbo currently has 15 source-displayable rows across 437 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.
GLM-5V-Turbo has a reported context window of 200K in the exact-model catalog record. The value stays visible, but the profile marks its source link as unavailable instead of presenting it as directly documented. Maximum output length remains separate because providers often publish a different limit.
Related resources
Last updated August 14, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.
Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.