Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data

Data as of October 20, 2026 · How the score is built

EstablishedProprietaryReasoning

Released Mar 19, 2025200K context

o1-pro

Decision readingo1-pro scores 35.7 out of 100 and ranks #161 of 227. This profile shows 1 source-displayable benchmark rows. API pricing is $150 input and $600 output per million tokens.

Released Mar 19, 2025 — see all recent releases

Decision snapshot

Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.

Capability

35.7/100

field median 49.8#161 of 227 ranked models

Public

#161of 227

Verified —

Price

$150input / $600 output

input median $0.72blended $375

Speed

Not measured

field median 93.5 tok/sTime to first token not measured

Context

200Ktokens

field median 256,000Reported for this model; direct source link not stored

Strongest published evidence

Published rows are visible, but no category has enough eligible evidence for a comparative rank.

Validate before choosing

1 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. Independent runtime speed has not been measured.

Source-linked · 1 displayable benchmark row

Category score record

Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.

Category scores, ranks, weighting, benchmark coverage, and evidence status
CategoryScore
AgenticWeight 22%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
CodingWeight 20%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
MultimodalWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
KnowledgeRank Not rankedWeight 12%1 benchmarkReported
79.0
MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
Inst. FollowingWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured

1 of 726 tracked benchmark slots have displayable evidence · bars run 0–100

Coverage details

How much of this is verified

Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.

  1. AgenticNot measured
  2. CodingNot measured
  3. ReasoningNot measured
  4. MultimodalNot measured
  5. Knowledge0/1 verified
  6. MultilingualNot measured
  7. Inst. FollowingNot measured
  8. MathNot measured
Verified sourceProvisionalNot measured

Benchmark ledger

Knowledge opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.

Knowledge1 row
Knowledge benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
GPQAGraduate-Level Google-Proof Q&AScore79%Versus best verified row

Best verified: GPT-6 Astra · 96%

Gap17 behindWeight3% ref. weight

Bars run 0–100; the dark tick marks the best source-verified value

All 1 rows

What it costs to get this score

Published API price against the public score. The x-axis uses a log scale; the dashed path marks models that are not beaten by a cheaper, higher-scoring option. Price uses average of published input and output rates.

Current modelExplore all models

o1-pro · 35.7 score · $375 blended per million tokens

The chart opens on the current model. Scroll horizontally to inspect the full price axis.

30405060708090100$0.10$0.50$1$5$10$25$50$100↘ frontiero1-pro

Horizontal: blended price per million tokens, log scale · Vertical: public score

Lineage

The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. Each score is estimated for that model; a relative can inform a sparse estimate but never sets a floor, so a newer release can score below an earlier one. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.

  1. Mar 19, 2025 · you are here

    o1-pro

    Score 35.7 · $150 / $600

Spec sheet

Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.

API model ID
Not published
Context window
200K
Maximum output
Not sourced yet
Knowledge cutoff
Not sourced yet
Input modalities
Not sourced yet
Output modalities
Not sourced yet
Parameters
Not disclosed by the provider
Availability
Not sourced yet
Cloud regions
Not tracked yet
Lifecycle
Established
API capabilities
Tool calling, structured outputs, and batch support are not tracked yet
Prompt caching
Not documented in the pricing record
Self-host
Weights are not published
Rate limits
Not tracked yet

How to read this profile

The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.

o1-pro ranks #161 of 227 on the public leaderboard with a score of 35.69/100. It does not yet have enough sourced coverage for a verified position.

o1-pro is a proprietary model with a 200K context window. It uses an explicit reasoning mode, which can improve complex problem solving while adding latency and token use.

o1-pro sits in the o1 family with o1, o1-preview. 1 of 726 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.

Last updated October 20, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.

Deployment options

Self-host and provider-specific paths stay separate from benchmark evidence so operating constraints are visible before a score becomes the whole decision.

Where to run o1-pro by API

OpenRouter is the one host we track that publishes a per-token price for it. Prices read from each host’s own pages on October 20, 2026.

Inference hosts for o1-pro with input, output and cached-input prices per million tokens.
HostInput /1MOutput /1MCached /1MContext
OpenRouter$150.00$600.00—200K
Compare inference hosts

Questions

How does o1-pro perform overall in AI benchmarks?

o1-pro ranks #161 out of 227 models on the public BenchAlign leaderboard, with a score of 35.69/100. Its evidence status is Estimated, and this profile shows 1 source-displayable benchmark row. The label describes evidence depth, not a provider quality claim; inspect category rows before choosing a workload.

Is o1-pro good for knowledge and understanding?

o1-pro has source-displayable benchmark coverage for knowledge and understanding, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

Which sibling models are related to o1-pro?

o1-pro belongs to the o1 family. Related tracked variants include o1, o1-preview. A sibling link indicates shared lineage or a documented configuration relationship; it does not mean the variants have identical pricing, context limits, benchmark evidence, or deployment behavior. Compare before switching.

Does o1-pro have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?

No. o1-pro currently has 2 source-displayable rows. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.

What is the context window size of o1-pro?

o1-pro has a reported context window of 200K in the exact-model catalog record. The value stays visible, but the profile marks its source link as unavailable instead of presenting it as directly documented. Maximum output length remains separate because providers often publish a different limit.

Watch o1-pro in the weekly brief

Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.

Read a sample issue

Join 5,600+ readers.

Compare o1-pro with every tracked model971 comparisons