Alibaba · Model release
Data as of September 27, 2026 · How the score is built
Released Mar 4, 2026262K context
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Decision readingQwen3.5-122B-A10B scores 40.1 out of 100 and ranks #113 of 194. This profile shows 15 source-displayable benchmark rows; its strongest eligible category is Multilingual at #10. Published weights can be self-hosted, but infrastructure cost varies and is not a comparable API token rate.
Released Mar 4, 2026 — see all recent releases
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B will be repriced, updated or retired. Get each notice with its source and date. Follow model changes
Share or export
Decision snapshot
Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.
Capability
40.1/100
field median 50.2#113 of 194 ranked models
Public
#113of 194
Verified —
Price
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
input median $0.97No comparable first-party hosted token rate
Speed
129tok/s
field median 91 tok/sFirst token 17.87 s
Context
262Ktokens
field median 256,000Reported for this model; direct source link not stored
Strongest published evidence
Multilingual ranks #10. A well-rounded choice across a range of tasks.
Validate before choosing
15 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. No comparable first-party API token rate is published.
Source-linked · 15 displayable benchmark rows
Follow model changesCategory score record
Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.
| Category | Score | Rank | Percentile | Weight | Benchmarks | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgenticRank #84 of 105Percentile 20thWeight 22%3 benchmarksVerified | 23.1 | 3 benchmarks | Verified | |||
| CodingRank #73 of 135Percentile 46thWeight 20%1 benchmarkVerified | 35.7 | 1 benchmark | Verified | |||
| ReasoningRank Not rankedWeight 17%1 benchmarkVerified | 49.8 | 1 benchmark | Verified | |||
| MultimodalRank #34 of 50Percentile 33rdWeight 12%5 benchmarksMixed sources | 57.0 | 5 benchmarks | Mixed sources | |||
| KnowledgeRank #86 of 158Percentile 46thWeight 12%3 benchmarksVerified | 41.5 | 3 benchmarks | Verified | |||
| MultilingualRank #10 of 12Percentile 18thWeight 7%1 benchmarkVerified | 36.8 | 1 benchmark | Verified | |||
| Inst. FollowingRank #11 of 124Percentile 92ndWeight 5%1 benchmarkVerified | 91.6 | 1 benchmark | Verified | |||
| MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
15 of 486 tracked benchmark slots have displayable evidence · bars run 0–100
Coverage detailsHow much of this is verified
Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.
- Agentic3/3 verified
- Coding1/1 verified
- Reasoning1/1 verified
- Multimodal3/5 verified
- Knowledge3/3 verified
- Multilingual1/1 verified
- Inst. Following1/1 verified
- MathNot measured
Capability shape
Each axis shows percentile within that category’s eligible cohort. The comparison outline is the median of the six nearest public-score peers; a collapsed vertex means the category is not rank-eligible.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B category percentile values
- Agentic20th percentile
- Coding46th percentile
- ReasoningNot eligible
- Multimodal33rd percentile
- Knowledge46th percentile
- Multilingual18th percentile
- Instruction following92nd percentile
- MathNot eligible
The dashed outline is median of 6 nearest peers.
Eligible category ranks
- Agentic#84/105
- Coding#73/135
- ReasoningNot ranked
- Multimodal#34/50
- Knowledge#86/158
- Multilingual#10/12
- Inst. Following#11/124
- MathNot ranked
Benchmark ledger
Coding opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.
Coding1 row
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench VerifiedSoftware Engineering Benchmark Verified | Score72% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 5 · 96% | Gap24 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
Agentic3 rows
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BrowseComp | Score63.8% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Atria Dawn Preview · 92.5% | Gap28.7 behind | Weight8% ref. weight | Provider exact |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Score49.4% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-5.5 · 82% | Gap32.6 behind | Weight7% ref. weight | Provider exact |
| OSWorld-Verified | Score58% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 86.1% | Gap28.1 behind | Weight7% ref. weight | Provider exact |
Reasoning1 row
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LongBench v2 | Score60.2% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 66.3% | Gap6.1 behind | WeightWeighted 25% | Provider exact |
Multimodal5 rows
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CharXivCharXiv Reasoning | Score77.2% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 93.5% | Gap16.3 behind | WeightWeighted 20% | Provider exact |
| MMMUMassive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding | Score83.9% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.6-27B · 82.9% | Gap1 behind | WeightDisplay only | Reported |
| MMVUMultimodal Multi-disciplinary Video Understanding | Score74.7% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 82.4% | Gap7.7 behind | WeightDisplay only | Reported |
| MathVision | Score86.2% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 95.2% | Gap9 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| V* | Score93.2% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Kimi K2.6 · 96.9% | Gap3.7 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
Knowledge3 rows
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-ProMassive Multitask Language Understanding Professional | Score86.7% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.7 Max · 89.6% | Gap2.9 behind | Weight6% ref. weight | Provider exact |
| GPQAGraduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A | Score86.6% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-6 Astra · 96% | Gap9.4 behind | Weight3% ref. weight | Provider exact |
| SuperGPQASuperGPQA: Scaling LLM Evaluation Across 285 Graduate Disciplines | Score67.1% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) · 73.9% | Gap6.8 behind | Weight2% ref. weight | Provider exact |
Multilingual1 row
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-ProX | Score82.2% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.7 Max · 87% | Gap4.8 behind | WeightWeighted 100% | Provider exact |
Inst. Following1 row
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFEvalInstruction-Following Eval | Score93.4% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.5-27B · 95% | Gap1.6 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
Bars run 0–100; the dark tick marks the best source-verified value
All 15 rowsLineage
The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. Each score is estimated for that model; a relative can inform a sparse estimate but never sets a floor, so a newer release can score below an earlier one. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.
Base entry
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B release history
Radar confirmed these at the source. Use Qwen3.5-122B-A10B in your work? Explore Radar to follow supported changes and choose your alerts.
Radar
Spec sheet
Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.
- API model ID
- Not published
- Context window
- 262K
- Maximum output
- Not sourced yet
- Knowledge cutoff
- Not sourced yet
- Input modalities
- Not sourced yet
- Output modalities
- Not sourced yet
- Parameters
- Not sourced yet
- Availability
- Not sourced yet
- Cloud regions
- Not tracked yet
- Lifecycle
- Established
- API capabilities
- Tool calling, structured outputs, and batch support are not tracked yet
- Prompt caching
- Not documented in the pricing record
- Self-host
- Open weights available; hardware estimate not sourced
- Rate limits
- Not tracked yet
How to read this profile
The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ranks #113 of 194 on the public leaderboard with a score of 40.06/100. It does not yet have enough sourced coverage for a verified position.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is a open weight model with a 262K context window. It uses an explicit reasoning mode, which can improve complex problem solving while adding latency and token use.
Official exact-value benchmark snapshot from the Qwen/Qwen3.5-122B-A10B-FP8 model card. Native context is 262,144 tokens and the model card notes extensibility up to roughly 1M tokens with RoPE scaling.
15 of 486 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.
Its strongest eligible category is Multilingual at #10, while its lowest eligible position is Knowledge at #86. a well-rounded choice across a range of tasks.
Last updated September 27, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.
Deployment options
Self-host and provider-specific paths stay separate from benchmark evidence so operating constraints are visible before a score becomes the whole decision.
Published weights are available, but BenchLM does not yet have a sourced parameter and VRAM profile for this exact model. Hardware cost estimates stay unavailable until that sizing record is complete.
Estimate VRAM from known parametersQuestions
How does Qwen3.5-122B-A10B perform overall in AI benchmarks?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ranks #113 out of 194 models on the public BenchAlign leaderboard, with a score of 40.06/100. Its evidence status is Estimated, and this profile shows 15 source-displayable benchmark rows. The label describes evidence depth, not a provider quality claim; inspect category rows before choosing a workload.
Is Qwen3.5-122B-A10B good for knowledge and understanding?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ranks #86 out of 158 eligible models for knowledge and understanding, with a public category score of 41.5/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
Is Qwen3.5-122B-A10B good for coding and programming?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ranks #73 out of 135 eligible models for coding and programming, with a public category score of 35.7/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
Is Qwen3.5-122B-A10B good for reasoning and logic?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has source-displayable benchmark coverage for reasoning and logic, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Is Qwen3.5-122B-A10B good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ranks #84 out of 105 eligible models for agentic tool use and computer tasks, with a public category score of 23.1/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
Is Qwen3.5-122B-A10B good for multimodal and grounded tasks?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ranks #34 out of 50 eligible models for multimodal and grounded tasks, with a public category score of 57/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
Is Qwen3.5-122B-A10B good for instruction following?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ranks #11 out of 124 eligible models for instruction following, with a public category score of 91.6/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
Is Qwen3.5-122B-A10B good for multilingual tasks?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ranks #10 out of 12 eligible models for multilingual tasks, with a public category score of 36.8/100. That places it in the current top ten for this category. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
Is Qwen3.5-122B-A10B open source?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is an open-weight model from Alibaba. Its weights can be downloaded for local or hosted deployment, subject to the published license. Open weight does not automatically mean open source: training data and training code may remain private, and commercial restrictions can still apply.
Does Qwen3.5-122B-A10B have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?
No. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B currently has 31 source-displayable rows across 486 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.
What is the context window size of Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has a reported context window of 262K in the exact-model catalog record. The value stays visible, but the profile marks its source link as unavailable instead of presenting it as directly documented. Maximum output length remains separate because providers often publish a different limit.