Skip to main content

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.6-27B

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

68

VS

Qwen3.6-27B

72

2 categoriesvs1 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B #6 · Qwen3.6-27B #10

Pick Qwen3.6-27B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Qwen3.6-27B
56.1vs59.3

+3.2 difference

Coding

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
72vs70.6

+1.4 difference

Knowledge

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
81.6vs62.2

+19.4 difference

Operational Comparison

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Qwen3.6-27B

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0 / $0

$0 / $0

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

262K

262K

Quick Verdict

Pick Qwen3.6-27B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Qwen3.6-27B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 72 to 68. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Qwen3.6-27B's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 59.3 against 56.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 49.4% to 59.3%. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Qwen3.6-27B?

Qwen3.6-27B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 72 to 68. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 49.4% and 59.3%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Qwen3.6-27B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.6 versus 62.2. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Qwen3.6-27B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 72 versus 70.6. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Qwen3.6-27B?

Qwen3.6-27B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 59.3 versus 56.1. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
API / mo$0
Self-host / moN/A
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Qwen3.6-27B
API / mo$0
Self-host / mo$429
Break-even
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 22, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.