Skip to main content

FACTS Parametric

A parametric factuality benchmark reported in DeepSeek-V4 base-model evaluations.

Benchmark score on FACTS Parametric — April 24, 2026

BenchLM mirrors the published score view for FACTS Parametric. DeepSeek V4 Pro Base leads the public snapshot at 62.6% , followed by DeepSeek V4 Flash Base (33.9%). BenchLM does not use these results to rank models overall.

2 modelsKnowledgeCurrentDisplay onlyUpdated April 24, 2026

About FACTS Parametric

Year

2026

Tasks

Parametric factual recall

Format

Exact match

Difficulty

Factual accuracy focused

BenchLM stores FACTS Parametric as a display-only provider-table row when exact values are published in DeepSeek-V4 evaluations.

BenchLM freshness & provenance

Version

FACTS Parametric 2026

Refresh cadence

Quarterly

Staleness state

Current

Question availability

Public benchmark set

CurrentDisplay only

BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.

Benchmark score table (2 models)

1
62.6%
2
33.9%

FAQ

What does FACTS Parametric measure?

A parametric factuality benchmark reported in DeepSeek-V4 base-model evaluations.

Which model scores highest on FACTS Parametric?

DeepSeek V4 Pro Base by DeepSeek currently leads with a score of 62.6% on FACTS Parametric.

How many models are evaluated on FACTS Parametric?

2 AI models have been evaluated on FACTS Parametric on BenchLM.

Compare Top Models on FACTS Parametric

Last updated: April 24, 2026 · BenchLM version FACTS Parametric 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.