A February 2025 HMMT slice used in exact-value provider tables for advanced contest-math reasoning.
BenchLM mirrors the published score view for HMMT Feb 2025. GLM-5 leads the public snapshot at 97.5% , followed by Qwen3.6 Plus (96.7%) and Kimi K2.5 (95.4%). BenchLM does not use these results to rank models overall.
GLM-5
Z.AI
Qwen3.6 Plus
Alibaba
Kimi K2.5
Moonshot AI
The published HMMT Feb 2025 snapshot is tightly clustered at the top: GLM-5 sits at 97.5%, while the third row is only 2.1 points behind. The broader top-10 spread is 6.8 points, so many of the published scores sit in a relatively narrow band.
6 models have been evaluated on HMMT Feb 2025. The benchmark falls in the Math category. This category carries a 5% weight in BenchLM.ai's overall scoring system. HMMT Feb 2025 is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.
Year
2025
Tasks
Competition math problems
Format
Contest mathematics
Difficulty
Olympiad-style mathematics
BenchLM stores this HMMT monthly slice separately from the aggregate HMMT rows so first-party exact values remain visible without overwriting the broader yearly HMMT reference.
Version
HMMT Feb 2025 2025
Refresh cadence
Quarterly
Staleness state
Current
Question availability
Public benchmark set
BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.
A February 2025 HMMT slice used in exact-value provider tables for advanced contest-math reasoning.
GLM-5 by Z.AI currently leads with a score of 97.5% on HMMT Feb 2025.
6 AI models have been evaluated on HMMT Feb 2025 on BenchLM.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.