Kimi K2.5

Kimi K2.5 ranks #86 out of 224 models on the public BenchAlign leaderboard, with a score of 53.05/100. Its evidence status is Supported, and this profile shows 68 source-displayable benchmark rows. The label describes evidence depth, not a provider quality claim; inspect category rows before choosing a workload.

Kimi K2.5 ranks #75 out of 184 eligible models for knowledge and understanding, with a public category score of 51.4/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Kimi K2.5 ranks #68 out of 150 eligible models for coding and programming, with a public category score of 38.5/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Kimi K2.5 has source-displayable benchmark coverage for mathematics, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

Kimi K2.5 has source-displayable benchmark coverage for reasoning and logic, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

Kimi K2.5 ranks #66 out of 128 eligible models for agentic tool use and computer tasks, with a public category score of 40.7/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Kimi K2.5 ranks #32 out of 54 eligible models for multimodal and grounded tasks, with a public category score of 70.4/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Kimi K2.5 ranks #48 out of 148 eligible models for instruction following, with a public category score of 85.8/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Kimi K2.5 ranks #8 out of 17 eligible models for multilingual tasks, with a public category score of 87.3/100. That places it in the current top ten for this category. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Kimi K2.5 is an open-weight model from Moonshot AI. Its weights can be downloaded for local or hosted deployment, subject to the published license. Open weight does not automatically mean open source: training data and training code may remain private, and commercial restrictions can still apply.

Kimi K2.5 belongs to the Kimi K2.5 family. Related tracked variants include Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning). A sibling link indicates shared lineage or a documented configuration relationship; it does not mean the variants have identical pricing, context limits, benchmark evidence, or deployment behavior. Compare before switching.

No. Kimi K2.5 currently has 84 source-displayable rows across 681 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.

Kimi K2.5 has a reported context window of 256K in the exact-model catalog record. The value stays visible, but the profile marks its source link as unavailable instead of presenting it as directly documented. Maximum output length remains separate because providers often publish a different limit.