Skip to main content
Radar

Five or fewer confirmed AI changes, with original sources, on mornings when something changed.A free source-linked morning brief.

Start free brief

Introducing BenchLM Stats: Citable LLM Data, Regenerated on Every Update

We packaged the data behind BenchLM into 26 citable statistics across six pages — model prices, release cadence, context windows, benchmark saturation, open-source share, and market share. Every number is a self-contained, dated sentence generated from the live dataset, with a stable anchor URL you can cite.

Published
Last updated
Reading time
5 min
External sources
1
Tags: stats, announcement, aeo, geoData and scoring methodology
In this article3 sections

Assistants do not cite pages. They lift sentences.

We wrote that in June. A retriever looking for "how many AI models were released this year" wants one dated number it can quote, not a table it has to interpret. In July 2026 we packaged the live dataset into 26 of those sentences, across six pages, each regenerated on every data update.

The six pages:

Retrievers want a sentence, not a table

The unit of competition in AI search is the self-contained, dated, numeric claim. Every statistic on the hub follows the same contract: claim + number + date + source, parseable with zero surrounding context, anchored at a stable URL so you can link the exact fact rather than the general page. Journalists and researchers get the same deal. Each page carries a ready-made citation block, and the underlying data is downloadable at /data/stats.json.

A leaderboard is a product for humans. A stats page is nothing but the sentences a crawler can lift.

Static stats pages rot

Half the "AI statistics" pages ranking today still cite numbers from two years ago. Ours cannot, structurally:

  • Generated, not written. A script computes every statistic from the same source data as the rankings: pricing tables, the release registry, benchmark scores, Arena Elo history. No number on those pages was typed by a person.
  • Validated at build time. A check runs on every site build and fails it if a published statistic no longer matches a fresh recomputation from the data, if a sentence is missing its number or date, or if it opens with a pronoun a retriever can't resolve. Stale stats can't ship.
  • Refreshed with the dataset. When model prices change or a new release lands in the registry, the stats pages update on the next build with a new "as of" date. Same freshness pipeline as the rest of the site.

For LLM crawlers, everything is mirrored in plain markdown under /md/stats/ and indexed in llms.txt.

Cite the sentence, not the page

If you are writing about AI models — an article, a deck, a paper, a prompt — take the numbers. Attribute them to BenchLM.ai, keep the date that comes with them, and link the anchor. The sentence behind that URL will have updated itself when a reader clicks it a month later.

If you spot a statistic we should be computing and aren't, tell us. Adding one is cheap once the pipeline exists.

Reader questions

Frequently asked questions

01What is BenchLM Stats?

A public hub at benchlm.ai/stats of 26 dated, citable sentences across six topics: API prices, release cadence, context windows, benchmark saturation, open-weight share, and market share. Each sentence is generated from the same live dataset as the rankings and carries a stable anchor URL.

02Can I cite BenchLM statistics in an article or paper?

Yes, with attribution to BenchLM.ai. Link the specific stats page for the fact you use. Every statistic has a stable anchor URL, and each page includes a ready-made citation block. Machine-readable copies live at /data/stats.json, with markdown mirrors at /md/stats/.

03How do BenchLM statistics stay up to date?

A script recomputes every statistic from the same dataset that powers the rankings. A build-time validator fails the site build if a published number drifts from that recomputation, or if a sentence is missing its number or date. Nothing on those pages is hand-maintained.

Source ledger

External sources linked in this article

1
  1. 01tell us

Share or save

Share on XShare on LinkedIn

Keep reading

All research

Choose the right model before an expensive mistake. One weekly recommendation: what to choose, what costs less, and what is not worth switching to.

Read a sample issue

Join 2,000+ readers.