Skip to main content

Claude Fable 5 vs Gemma 4 31B

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Claude Fable 5

96

VS

Gemma 4 31B

64

3 categoriesvs0 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Fable 5 #2 · Gemma 4 31B unranked

Pick Claude Fable 5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 31B only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Coding

Claude Fable 5
85.6vs41.6

+44.0 difference

Knowledge

Claude Fable 5
74.8vs61.3

+13.5 difference

Multimodal

Claude Fable 5
92.4vs76.9

+15.5 difference

Operational Comparison

Claude Fable 5

Gemma 4 31B

Price (per 1M tokens)

$10 / $50

$0 / $0

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

1M+

256K

Quick Verdict

Pick Claude Fable 5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 31B only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

Claude Fable 5 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 96 to 64. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Claude Fable 5's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 85.6 against 41.6. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HLE, 64.5% to 26.5%.

Claude Fable 5 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $10.00 input / $50.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Gemma 4 31B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Claude Fable 5 gives you the larger context window at 1M+, compared with 256K for Gemma 4 31B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Claude Fable 5 or Gemma 4 31B?

Claude Fable 5 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 96 to 64. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HLE, where the scores are 64.5% and 26.5%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Claude Fable 5 or Gemma 4 31B?

Claude Fable 5 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 74.8 versus 61.3. Inside this category, HLE w/o tools is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or Gemma 4 31B?

Claude Fable 5 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 85.6 versus 41.6. Gemma 4 31B stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Claude Fable 5 or Gemma 4 31B?

Claude Fable 5 has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 92.4 versus 76.9. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Claude Fable 5
API / mo$0
Self-host / moN/A
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Gemma 4 31B
API / mo$0
Self-host / mo$429
Break-even
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 9, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.