Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Claude Mythos Preview
99
Holo3-35B-A3B
100
Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Mythos Preview #1 · Holo3-35B-A3B unranked
Pick Holo3-35B-A3B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude Mythos Preview only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 1M context window or you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.
Agentic
+0.2 difference
Claude Mythos Preview
Holo3-35B-A3B
$25 / $125
$null / $null
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1M
64K
Pick Holo3-35B-A3B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude Mythos Preview only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 1M context window or you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.
Holo3-35B-A3B finishes one point ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 100 to 99. That is enough to call, but not enough to treat as a blowout. This matchup comes down to a few meaningful edges rather than one model dominating the board.
Holo3-35B-A3B's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 82.6 against 82.4. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is OSWorld-Verified, 79.6% to 82.6%.
Claude Mythos Preview is the reasoning model in the pair, while Holo3-35B-A3B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Claude Mythos Preview gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 64K for Holo3-35B-A3B.
Holo3-35B-A3B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 100 to 99. The biggest single separator in this matchup is OSWorld-Verified, where the scores are 79.6% and 82.6%.
Holo3-35B-A3B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 82.6 versus 82.4. Inside this category, OSWorld-Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.