Skip to main content

Claude Opus 4.5 vs GLM-4.7

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Claude Opus 4.5

80

VS

GLM-4.7

71

2 categoriesvs1 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.5 #7 · GLM-4.7 unranked

Pick Claude Opus 4.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-4.7 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Claude Opus 4.5
62.5vs45.3

+17.2 difference

Coding

GLM-4.7
65.9vs70.6

+4.7 difference

Knowledge

Claude Opus 4.5
66.2vs60.6

+5.6 difference

Operational Comparison

Claude Opus 4.5

GLM-4.7

Price (per 1M tokens)

$null / $null

$0 / $0

Speed

46 t/s

82 t/s

Latency (TTFT)

1.01s

1.10s

Context Window

200K

200K

Quick Verdict

Pick Claude Opus 4.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-4.7 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.

Claude Opus 4.5 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 80 to 71. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Claude Opus 4.5's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 62.5 against 45.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 59.3% to 41%. GLM-4.7 does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

GLM-4.7 is the reasoning model in the pair, while Claude Opus 4.5 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.5 or GLM-4.7?

Claude Opus 4.5 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 80 to 71. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 59.3% and 41%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Claude Opus 4.5 or GLM-4.7?

Claude Opus 4.5 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 66.2 versus 60.6. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.5 or GLM-4.7?

GLM-4.7 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 70.6 versus 65.9. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Claude Opus 4.5 or GLM-4.7?

Claude Opus 4.5 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 62.5 versus 45.3. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 20, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.